Blackjack and Card Counting Forums - BlackjackInfo.com

  #51  
Old November 12th, 2009, 09:05 AM
blackjack avenger blackjack avenger is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 593
Default Semantics?

Quote:
Originally Posted by StandardDeviant View Post
Well, not exactly. 9N0 would be the number of hands one would need play to play in order for 99.5% of all outcomes to be > 0. This does not guarantee that one's outcome will be around expectation, unless we define the word "around" pretty broadly. It does however say that after 9N0 hands, it would be pretty unlikely for a player to still be losing money.
I agree
However, I did not say "guarantee" and yes the word "around" is pretty broad. Where will most players outcomes be at 9NO? Most players will have results clustered around EV. We agree that most will be winning.

So if you go back to the original post and someone wondering about their luck or when they are due for a win. My response is to play to the long run NOs.

So
at 9NO fixed
36NO resizing
most will be winning
many will be around expectation

Nothing wrong with clarification!
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old November 12th, 2009, 04:35 PM
StandardDeviant's Avatar
StandardDeviant StandardDeviant is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eastern U.S.
Posts: 470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackjack avenger View Post
Nothing wrong with clarification!
I think we're in violent agreement.

I confess that I am on a bit of a one-woman campaign to keep people from assuming that counting guarantees that they will realize EV in the near term.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old November 12th, 2009, 04:55 PM
daddybo's Avatar
daddybo daddybo is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: In Bound
Posts: 992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StandardDeviant View Post
.....I confess that I am on a bit of a one-woman campaign ....
When did you get to be a woman? I really thought you were a guy.
__________________
There Is No Second Place Winner ...even if your not brusque and merely informative.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old November 12th, 2009, 05:55 PM
StandardDeviant's Avatar
StandardDeviant StandardDeviant is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eastern U.S.
Posts: 470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daddybo View Post
When did you get to be a woman? I really thought you were a guy.
Was it something I said?
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old November 12th, 2009, 07:06 PM
Jack_Black's Avatar
Jack_Black Jack_Black is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Mountain States area
Posts: 139
Default

what the F? you really are woman? I thought that was kind of strange when I saw a post of yours that said. "what's a woman to do?" I thought to myself, I think a woman could care less about what we were talking about. what the hell is this guy smoking? Most other females on here make it known right away, maybe that's why it is so shocking.
__________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
Albert Einstein

Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new.
Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old November 12th, 2009, 09:47 PM
daddybo's Avatar
daddybo daddybo is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: In Bound
Posts: 992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StandardDeviant View Post
Was it something I said?
probably not, just predisposed chauvinism.
__________________
There Is No Second Place Winner ...even if your not brusque and merely informative.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005-2009 Bayview Strategies LLC