
|

December 11th, 2009, 05:11 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NO LONGER HERE
Posts: 2,884
|
|
Well, yes in the case of Zen it would be Aces. I was trying to keep the descriptions close for the two ace side-count methods. But, this method of side-counting makes very little difference and is quite a pain. Generally people don't side count aces in ace-reckoned systems.
I have not seen the program. But it sounds like it is generating multi-parameter tables, which is altogether different.
Last edited by QFIT; December 11th, 2009 at 05:14 AM.
|

December 11th, 2009, 09:12 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 29
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by QFIT
Well, yes in the case of Zen it would be Aces. I was trying to keep the descriptions close for the two ace side-count methods. But, this method of side-counting makes very little difference and is quite a pain. Generally people don't side count aces in ace-reckoned systems.
I have not seen the program. But it sounds like it is generating multi-parameter tables, which is altogether different.
|
Thanks. And, yes, it is generating multi-parameter tables. Is your CVData generating multi-parameter tables? Or could you please describe briefly what the outcome will be like using your program, suppose I input an arbitrary counting (Ace-reckoned) system? Thanks!
|

December 11th, 2009, 09:17 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NO LONGER HERE
Posts: 2,884
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BJmath
Thanks. And, yes, it is generating multi-parameter tables. Is your CVData generating multi-parameter tables? Or could you please describe briefly what the outcome will be like using your program, suppose I input an arbitrary counting (Ace-reckoned) system? Thanks!
|
I don't directly support multi-param index generation. Although you could probably alter the deck and trick t into generating them. I do support simulation of MP counts.
|

December 11th, 2009, 02:12 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: So,IL
Posts: 1,918
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by QFIT
I don't directly support multi-param index generation. Although you could probably alter the deck and trick t into generating them. I do support simulation of MP counts.
|
You can however, input your numbers, and you use the side count attachment, for playing purposes, correct?
|

December 11th, 2009, 02:21 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NO LONGER HERE
Posts: 2,884
|
|
Correct. CVBJ supports MP counts.
|

October 8th, 2011, 02:48 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 29
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by QFIT
Correct. CVBJ supports MP counts.
|
BTW, where can I input my counting strategy before running simulations to generate indexes using your CVData? Thanks!
|

October 8th, 2011, 02:54 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NO LONGER HERE
Posts: 2,884
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BJmath
BTW, where can I input my counting strategy before running simulations to generate indexes using your CVData? Thanks!
|
Create a user strategy (Define/Edit Strategy). It is best to base it on Composite Basic Strategy and add the tag values and TC calculation type.
|

October 8th, 2011, 03:01 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 29
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by QFIT
Create a user strategy (Define/Edit Strategy). It is best to base it on Composite Basic Strategy and add the tag values and TC calculation type.
|
Thanks for your quick reply! I found it already after my post (long time no touch and forgot about it)... Thanks.
|

October 8th, 2011, 06:54 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 29
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by QFIT
Create a user strategy (Define/Edit Strategy). It is best to base it on Composite Basic Strategy and add the tag values and TC calculation type.
|
For a user-defined counting strategy, your CVData calculate the true count by dividing the raw count by the # of decks left, correct? As a result, if this counting strategy is of high level, the magnitude of the true count indexes will be increased correspondingly, correct? Thanks!
|

October 8th, 2011, 06:55 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NO LONGER HERE
Posts: 2,884
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BJmath
For a user-defined counting strategy, your CVData calculate the true count by dividing the raw count by the # of decks left, correct? As a result, if this counting strategy is of high level, the magnitude of the true count indexes will be increased correspondingly, correct? Thanks!
|
On the counts tab, set the TC calculation to whatever you wish.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:07 PM.
|