Blackjack and Card Counting Forums - BlackjackInfo.com

  #1  
Old October 9th, 2011, 04:40 PM
blackjack avenger's Avatar
blackjack avenger blackjack avenger is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,267
Default N0 Infinite Bank

I believe in theory with an infinite bank one would bet table max at any advantage. This technique would result in a horrible N0, DI & SCORE. The measures we are suppose to care about. Even with an infinite bank should't one care about game quality?
  #2  
Old October 9th, 2011, 05:40 PM
tthree tthree is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackjack avenger View Post
I believe in theory with an infinite bank one would bet table max at any advantage. This technique would result in a horrible N0, DI & SCORE. The measures we are suppose to care about. Even with an infinite bank should't one care about game quality?
With a truly infinite bank you could lose every hand you play and you would still have an infinite bank. What have you actually lost?
  #3  
Old October 9th, 2011, 06:53 PM
iCountNTrack's Avatar
iCountNTrack iCountNTrack is offline
ChemMeister
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 780
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackjack avenger View Post
I believe in theory with an infinite bank one would bet table max at any advantage. This technique would result in a horrible N0, DI & SCORE. The measures we are suppose to care about. Even with an infinite bank should't one care about game quality?
Yes, if you are playing a negative expectation game, you will loose an infinite amount of money even if your bankroll is infinite. When talking about infinity, we need to use limit theory, because infinity is a concept and not a number.

http://www.blackjackinfo.com/bb/show...&postcount=259

check the above link for a more detailed explanation
  #4  
Old October 9th, 2011, 07:34 PM
psyduck's Avatar
psyduck psyduck is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 707
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tthree View Post
With a truly infinite bank you could lose every hand you play and you would still have an infinite bank. What have you actually lost?
LOL! Good thinking!

I wonder what spread I need to achieve that bank.
  #5  
Old October 10th, 2011, 07:19 AM
blackjack avenger's Avatar
blackjack avenger blackjack avenger is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,267
Default N0 Focus?

With an infinite bank why play? We can have subjective reasons to play or just be greedy.

I think the idea of an infinite bank is ror is eliminated so why not chase EV at every opportunity?

If those game measure DI, SCORE & N0 mean anything then they should tell us that we still want to play with the mentioned game measures in mind even with an infinite bank.
  #6  
Old October 13th, 2011, 09:05 PM
Nynefingers Nynefingers is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 355
Default

I would think we'd just want to maximize CE. For an bankroll approaching infinity, CE approaches EV, so we'd just maximize EV. N0 may be huge, but since our bets are insignificant relative to the bankroll, we can handle that large N0 and it won't be that big of a deal.
  #7  
Old October 14th, 2011, 03:30 AM
blackjack avenger's Avatar
blackjack avenger blackjack avenger is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,267
Default N0 Rebuttal

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nynefingers View Post
I would think we'd just want to maximize CE. For an bankroll approaching infinity, CE approaches EV, so we'd just maximize EV. N0 may be huge, but since our bets are insignificant relative to the bankroll, we can handle that large N0 and it won't be that big of a deal.
However,
With a near infinite or very very large bank we still want to win? Are we variance junkies? A simple wonging 1 to 2 spread greatly outperforms; in SCORE & N0, a flat spread.

Perhaps there is a fine line in terminology?:
Infinite bank, bet max every opportunity
Less then infinite bank, SCORE & N0 should be considered

So instead of N0 rebuttal
I used N0 to rebute
  #8  
Old October 14th, 2011, 09:11 PM
Nynefingers Nynefingers is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 355
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackjack avenger View Post
However,
With a near infinite or very very large bank we still want to win? Are we variance junkies? A simple wonging 1 to 2 spread greatly outperforms; in SCORE & N0, a flat spread.

Perhaps there is a fine line in terminology?:
Infinite bank, bet max every opportunity
Less then infinite bank, SCORE & N0 should be considered

So instead of N0 rebuttal
I used N0 to rebute
For a large, but not infinite bankroll, I still think we maximize CE. By its definition, CE is the amount you would accept with no variance in exchange for not taking the risky bet. If someone with an infinite bank were around and willing to buy out all of our bets at exactly our CE and take on the variance for us, we'd clearly want to maximize CE. I don't see why that would change if we were actually making the bets. They are either worth that much to us or they aren't, and if they aren't, we simply adjust our utility function to more closely match our reality and calcuate CE based on that.
  #9  
Old October 14th, 2011, 09:57 PM
aslan's Avatar
aslan aslan is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 8,683
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tthree View Post
With a truly infinite bank you could lose every hand you play and you would still have an infinite bank. What have you actually lost?
Wouldn't an infinite bankroll preclude there being any money left to win from the casino in the first place? I mean, which is larger-- all the money in the universe or an infinite bankroll? I'm not greedy-- I'd settle for all the money in the universe-- at least that's a finite amount. And if I had all the money in the universe, I'd have to loan the casino money so that I could play.
  #10  
Old October 14th, 2011, 10:01 PM
aslan's Avatar
aslan aslan is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 8,683
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tthree View Post
With a truly infinite bank you could lose every hand you play and you would still have an infinite bank. What have you actually lost?
Name:  smiley-think007.gif
Views: 256
Size:  2.1 KB Infinitely less than what you began with.
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:02 AM.


Forum Software vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005-2011 Bayview Strategies LLC