You can't really make a blanket statement like that. For example, I'm fairly confident I could scrape out a living playing poker if it was the only game available to me, but I'd make far, far less than I would in my typical gambling pursuits even if I were limited to just counting cards. You may argue that the lack of heat is nice, but then there's also lack of comps, massive amounts of boredom (for me at least), and at least in my case, less winnings than I get from other forms of gambling.
Yet another semantic misunderstanding.
I should have defined my terms.
"Proficiency" is relative.
Relative to YOUR skill-level at other A.P. moves …
Proficiency, in this context, denotes the ability to "earn a secure middle-class living"
Yet another semantic misunderstanding.
I should have defined my terms.
"Proficiency" is relative.
Relative to YOUR skill-level at other A.P. moves …
Proficiency, in this context, denotes the ability to "earn a secure middle-class living"