are they beatable?
http://tamburin.casinocitytimes.com/article/continuous-shufflers-revisited-1326
1. The average number of 10s per hand is slightly higher with a CMS game than with a game that uses a cut card.
2. The probability of getting a blackjack is slightly higher with a CSM game than it is with a game using a cut card.
3. The casino's edge over a basic strategy player is actually slightly less in a CSM game vs. a game using a cut card.
4. Overall the player in a CSM game will stand to lose about 20% more money because they will be dealt 20% more hands per hour in a CSM game.
...
we all know that CSM's will never work for counters. and we know a BS player, on average, will lose more money playing CSM's
but that's because BS was created for cutcard tables where there are certain amounts of high value and low value cards. I mean, how was BS created? on top of common sense hit/stay moves, was any of it created based on %age of won/lost hands in certain situations???
has anyone tried to ever create their own basic strategy chart for a CSM from a simulator ? i know it sounds stupid, but CSM's are everywhere, and my friend is buggin' me to ask if anyone else think's its possible to play and beat these