right, what?, you'd need how many cumulative spread sheets and then i haven't the foggiest how many hard drives to hold them
:whip:, lol i don't even know, scary to think how many man hours to do it.
long way of saying it's a logistical nightmare, lol.
maybe you'd need statistics applied to statistics as a heuristic, lol, i dunno.
QFIT, you replied to a post referencing Dubey's stuff before:
http://www.blackjackinfo.com/bb/showpost.php?p=135208&postcount=75
well, it seemed in that post that you are familiar with Dubey's stuff and i'd guess also Gwynn and Seri situational stuff, like Snyder talks about in this link:
http://www.blackjackforumonline.com/content/betting_systems_no_need_to_count_system.htm
long way of saying i'm just curious where you and maybe Snyder are getting information regarding such stuff.
like, ok in the one link you stated that "the effect of the last hand is very small -- extremely small in shoes. The effect does not accumulate in multiple hands. That is, losing a hand has a tiny impact on the next hand, assuming no intervening shuffle. Losing four hands in a row has about the same effect -- it does not multiply. None of these effects are large enough to matter."
Snyder implies the same sort of thing when he says, "The problem with utilizing this type of strategy is that none of the advantage indicators are very strong. In most games, they would simply indicate that the house had less of an advantage over the player, not that the advantage had risen to a player advantage. In deeply dealt one-deck games, with good (Las Vegas Strip) rules, all of these indicators combined might provide the player who is making small bets of $5 and high bets of $100 (1-20 spread) with an expectation of about $1-$2 per hour. In other words, no individual situational indicator is worth more than a few hundredths of a percent, and all of them combined are not worth much more than a few tenths of a percent, in a deeply dealt one-deck game with a big betting spread."
ok, i mean i certainly wouldn't argue the fact with you, i'm just curious what research, simulation, what ever, just how did you come to that conclusion?
what ever, i think Dubey said he only ran about five million rounds, that would be nothing compared with what cv stuff could do.