I've used the red 7 counting system on several occasions with below avg. results. I've lost money when the count was positive and won money when the count was negative. I believe this is called negative fluctuation. I understand that the card counter isn't going to win all the time. I also understand that in the long run the card counter should come out ahead. However, i've won far more money using oscars grind than I ever did counting cards. I do admit that i've used OG many more times than I have card counting. Currently i'm using OG but card counting as well. However, im not betting based on the count. Im using the card counting to help with my decision to leave a table before I get my butt handed to me on a silver platter.
My questions:
How does a card counter have anymore advantage over a player using oscars grind? The player can stop the grind and leave the table when things get bad just like a card counter leaving a table when the count goes big time negative.
Oscars grind can win during positive and negative counts just like card counting. Oscars grind can win even though the house wins more hands, which is a very powerful weapon. If you really look at the betting of oscars grind it kind of mimics the betting of a card counter. What I mean by that is the card counter makes his money by betting low when the count is negative and betting bigger when the count is positive. The card counter wins bigger bets which cancel out many smaller bets that lost. This is similar to oscars grind. Oscars Grind works by winning bigger bets and losing smaller bets which allows the player to win money even though he's lost more hands than the house.
Card counting does work. I personally feel that using oscars grind with win and stop loss limits is just as powerful as card counting.
I do feel that OG is the only betting system that actually works. Most of the other systems are losers. Now a player that counts cards while using OG can be a very dangerous player for the casinos.
My questions:
How does a card counter have anymore advantage over a player using oscars grind? The player can stop the grind and leave the table when things get bad just like a card counter leaving a table when the count goes big time negative.
Oscars grind can win during positive and negative counts just like card counting. Oscars grind can win even though the house wins more hands, which is a very powerful weapon. If you really look at the betting of oscars grind it kind of mimics the betting of a card counter. What I mean by that is the card counter makes his money by betting low when the count is negative and betting bigger when the count is positive. The card counter wins bigger bets which cancel out many smaller bets that lost. This is similar to oscars grind. Oscars Grind works by winning bigger bets and losing smaller bets which allows the player to win money even though he's lost more hands than the house.
Card counting does work. I personally feel that using oscars grind with win and stop loss limits is just as powerful as card counting.
I do feel that OG is the only betting system that actually works. Most of the other systems are losers. Now a player that counts cards while using OG can be a very dangerous player for the casinos.