sagefr0g said:
but not so good if that enrichment is the result of decieving the public in such a way that the public would take action in good faith based on that decietful information and suffer loss as a result. which is the premiss of the argument. thing is it seems the information is probably just in error and not deliberate deciet. but who knows lol.
I very much admire your and Automatic's scruples (such are rare, to be sure), but at the same time, ollywood routinely dramatizes, exaggerates, and just plain errs. Nowanyone so impulsive as to rush headlong into a casino and attempt card-counting on the basis of a single film almost DESERVES to lose. It is well known that, in films purporting to be based on fact, Hollywood routinely dramatizes, exaggerates, reinterprets, and just plain errs. Now, if it were on the basis of a single (reputable) BOOK purporting to contain totally factual, perfectly valid info, that would be a different story.
wvbjplayer