Automatic Monkey said:
Gee, and how would I have known that precisely? Lucky guess, of course.
You didn't, you were just trying to take what you felt was a ridiculous idea and pitch it because you don't like BJI. I do find it very ammusing how you've materialized your dislike of certain posters into an entire distrust of a whole group of people. Especially since those posters have done nothing other than tell you you are wrong.
Automatic Monkey said:
Play with zero variance, and no monetary consequences??? Why would anyone want to do that in a casino? I can do that at home on my simulator, with no smoke and better drinks. My time is valuable to me and I would never play blackjack with no monetary consequences. Variance is an unavoidable part of any game with a random element and accepting it is part of being an AP.
Now you are being very narrow minded. You've completely limited your thoughts about the game to what you know. There are ways to play the game with zero variance and a very high payday at the end - not that i would discuss them with you or any other person.
By the way, deliberately taking someone else's post out of context doesn't make you look smart. Get back to me whenever you're ready with the standard "that's what he said" bit :yawn:
Automatic Monkey said:
It's not for me. I'll happily take 100% of my profits and absorb 100% of my losses, and that leaves 0% for the hucksters of the gaming world.
Many of the people out there who are held in high regard by many here would fall into that catagory. You'd be surprised who's used this and truthfully if done right, no-one gets scammed.
RJT.