Blackjack and Card Counting Forums - BlackjackInfo.com

  #1  
Old July 27th, 2008, 08:25 AM
patterson patterson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1
Default risk of ruin/ betting strategy

I have been practicing blackjack for a while and now feel ready to take on the casinos. The only problem is that i only have $2,500 to start with. With only 6-8 deck games available in my area i know i can not afford to sit through all the negative counts. So i was wondering if anyone knew what the risk of ruin would be if I used the following approach or if it would be a good idea to do such. I would wong in with a count of +2 or better. I would bet $15 on a count of +1 and $25 with a count of +2 or better. If the count dropped below +1 i would leave the table. Any feed back on this would be greatly appreciated or if anyone has a good idea on how to attack 6 to 8 deck shoes with such a small bankroll.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old July 27th, 2008, 08:43 AM
blackjack avenger blackjack avenger is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 593
Default Reasonably Sound

Entering at TC2 and willing to play down to TC1 is reasonable. I would lower your bet to the table minimum at TC1 given your small bankroll. Do not play any negative hands.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old July 28th, 2008, 10:22 AM
Sonny's Avatar
Sonny Sonny is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,967
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by patterson View Post
I would wong in with a count of +2 or better. I would bet $15 on a count of +1 and $25 with a count of +2 or better. If the count dropped below +1 i would leave the table.
You didn't mention the counting system or game rules, but here's a generic estimation:

EV = $7.25/hour
SD = $126.69/hour
ROR = 10.42%
N0 = 30,536

You need to use a bigger spread than 1:1.67. Maybe something like this:

+1 = $15
+2 = $15
+3 = $25
+4 = 2 x $25
+5 = 2 x $25
+6 = 2 x $25
>+6= 2 x $50

EV = $12.06/hour
SD = $157.13/hour
ROR = 8.66%
N0 = 16,976

Using a bigger spread can earn more money, lower your risk and get you to the long run much sooner if done properly. You will have to decide how much risk you are comfortable with so you'll have to tinker around for a while to find your final bet spread.

-Sonny-
__________________
It's not the size of your bankroll, it's how you leverage it!

Last edited by Sonny; July 28th, 2008 at 10:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old July 28th, 2008, 12:25 PM
N&B's Avatar
N&B N&B is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: N.E. US
Posts: 395
Default

Basically, I agree with Sonny. As a different perspective, try a single $50 bet at +4 or more. It does have a higher SD, but in some places, going to 2 hands also raises flags. The 3 1/3:1 spread ain't great, but does lend itself to the nibbling pihranna style of play.

Personlly at a $15 table, I don't like $100 bets of any type. YOMV, and are respected.
__________________
To err is human, to air is Jordan, to arrr is pirate.
Theres plenty of face cards to make 20, but it takes an Ace to make Blackjack.

Nickel & Dime them into Bankruptcy.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005-2009 Bayview Strategies LLC