Blackjack and Card Counting Forums - BlackjackInfo.com

  #1  
Old October 29th, 2008, 05:04 PM
glovesetc glovesetc is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,948
Default GM and Chrysler merger - joke of the decade

for everyone except the tax payer cause they want to borrow 10 billion to make this debacle happen! Waggoner made 44 million from 2003 to 2007 { according to Barrons} and the Chrysler CEO was dramatically underpaid during that time at 34 million { according to barrons } as they produced crappy cars and worse off cars that no one wanted like Dodge Ram3500 series trucks , Vipers, and hemi powered 300's and GM produced SUV's, trucks , Hummers , and other mutant vehicles that no one wanted but both companies said we know what is best for you the consumer . You need to listen to us cause we are smarter then your ignorant a$$ anyhow and we make more so we can pay ourselves more and have our lavish lifestyle while you morons that keep buying them struggle . You , the consumer , is stupid, ignorant , ripe for the picking, falls for our slick advertising and are just ignoramuses!!! Now we were wrong so now we want you dumb bowel movements to help us bail ourselves out so we may continue the screwing you so richly deserve because you are stupid. The union workers are only getting $30.00 an hour and they are not too happy and the retirees legacy payments like pensions, drugs , and healthcare are unhappy too but we are truly working on a way to screw them out of it though to help cut costs and boost my million dollar paychecks up a few million a year . The tax payer has plenty of money so we get a good chance now to ream them too . Never mind the billions we are getting from TARP we need more to keep all the high priced help we have content . Guess now is the time to let them fail in my opinion . They will not be happy trying to compete against Honda, Toyota, and Hyundai , and the others cause their costs are lower and their quality is higher . Time for you to compete and if you can not you will fail and without taking the tax payer for another ride . Better for you to fail without our dumb and stupid tax payers monies!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old November 1st, 2008, 08:20 PM
zengrifter's Avatar
zengrifter zengrifter is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,200
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glovesetc View Post
for everyone except the tax payer cause they want to borrow 10 billion to make this debacle happen! Waggoner made 44 million from 2003 to 2007 { according to Barrons} and the Chrysler CEO was dramatically underpaid during that time at 34 million { according to barrons } as they produced crappy cars and worse off cars that no one wanted like Dodge Ram3500 series trucks , Vipers, and hemi powered 300's and GM produced SUV's, trucks , Hummers , and other mutant vehicles that no one wanted but both companies said we know what is best for you the consumer . You need to listen to us cause we are smarter then your ignorant a$$ anyhow and we make more so we can pay ourselves more and have our lavish lifestyle while you morons that keep buying them struggle . You , the consumer , is stupid, ignorant , ripe for the picking, falls for our slick advertising and are just ignoramuses!!! Now we were wrong so now we want you dumb bowel movements to help us bail ourselves out so we may continue the screwing you so richly deserve because you are stupid. The union workers are only getting $30.00 an hour and they are not too happy and the retirees legacy payments like pensions, drugs , and healthcare are unhappy too but we are truly working on a way to screw them out of it though to help cut costs and boost my million dollar paychecks up a few million a year . The tax payer has plenty of money so we get a good chance now to ream them too . Never mind the billions we are getting from TARP we need more to keep all the high priced help we have content . Guess now is the time to let them fail in my opinion . They will not be happy trying to compete against Honda, Toyota, and Hyundai , and the others cause their costs are lower and their quality is higher . Time for you to compete and if you can not you will fail and without taking the tax payer for another ride . Better for you to fail without our dumb and stupid tax payers monies!!!!
Let em be bought by a Chinese company. z g
__________________
.
...The Zengrifter Interview. ..The Zen Zone .......Vote!: Has America Become Fascist?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old November 2nd, 2008, 01:15 AM
GeorgeD GeorgeD is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zengrifter View Post
Let em be bought by a Chinese company. z g
We might have to PAY the chineese to take them. Maybe with and back agreement in 5 years we can get them back better -- leaner 'n meaner.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old November 2nd, 2008, 06:29 AM
Liquid Chips's Avatar
Liquid Chips Liquid Chips is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 196
Default

What? You don't like the 2010 Camaro??

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old November 3rd, 2008, 11:26 PM
moo321 moo321 is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,800
Default

It pisses me off because I bought Tata Motors and these dumbass companies are dragging the whole sector down.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old November 3rd, 2008, 11:33 PM
glovesetc glovesetc is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,948
Default indeed but

the loans were voted down today so that is good news . Management stinks as well as products . Ford at $2.10 a share is a disgrace .
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old November 4th, 2008, 07:51 AM
InPlay InPlay is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glovesetc View Post
the loans were voted down today so that is good news . Management stinks as well as products . Ford at $2.10 a share is a disgrace .
What a stupid statement that you made. That happens when you shoot from the hip and are not well informed of the real impact of the auto companies have on the whole economy. You said you used to own a warehouse what did you pay your workers minimum wage ? Read. By the way I would never be caught dead in a Wal Mart store. Cheap Chinese ****. Hope your don't brush your teeth with some anti freeze trying to save 2 cents.

Monday, November 3, 2008

Analysts: Big 3 woes imperil U.S. economy

Alisa Priddle / The Detroit News

Auto manufacturers and related businesses employ as many as 3.1 million workers across the United States, a broad network of jobs that loom large for federal officials considering taking steps to bolster domestic carmakers whose plummeting sales have created a cash crisis that threatens the very concept of the Big Three.

Every direct job at an automaker in the United States creates five more jobs, said Sean McAlinden, chief economist and vice president for research for the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor. Two of the five are related to suppliers or dealers; the other three are spinoff jobs at businesses where auto industry workers spend their paychecks.

The next closest industry to autos is high-tech, where each job creates a total of four, including spinoffs, he said. By contrast, one Wall Street position creates a total of about 2.5 jobs, yet Congress expedited aid to the financial services sector this year.

"The cost benefit to the economy (of helping automakers) is better than any individual buyout offered on Wall Street," McAlinden said.

No other industry in America has as broad and significant an impact -- even with the restructuring by Detroit's Big Three automakers in recent years that has closed factories and cost tens of thousands of jobs, McAlinden said.

That's why Michigan politicians, union leaders, auto executives and governors from five other states are lobbying for federal aid for the industry, saying the help is necessary to prevent huge job losses from a bankruptcy or collapse of one or more of Detroit's automakers.

Officials lobbying for aid

They're lobbying to get a piece of the U.S. Treasury Department's $700 billion fund to help salvage the economy, or other aid, as well as accelerate and possibly expand the $25 billion loan program approved to help automakers modernize their factories to build more fuel-efficient models.

Declining auto sales have contributed to the nation's economic downturn, but that hasn't diminished the industry's importance, said Charles Chesbrough, senior economist for CSM Worldwide in Northville, an automotive market research firm.

"We won't see a turnaround in the economy as a whole," he said, "until we see improvement in the auto industry."

The importance of the auto sector will be underscored this week when the Center for Automotive Research plans to release a new analysis of the impact on the economy if operations cease at any of the Big Three. McAlinden said the resulting drop in tax income and other losses over three years would far exceed the amount being sought in government aid. When the jobs tied to everything from buying a car to washing it and refining the gas that fuels it are added to the total, more than 14 million U.S. workers -- about 1 in 10 -- can draw a line from their job back to an auto factory or office worker, according to CAR.

355K workers at carmakers

In a letter to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, Gov. Jennifer Granholm and five other governors said automakers in the United States directly employ about 355,000 workers.

The nation has 783,100 people who make parts for automakers, either for installation at the factory or for sale in the aftermarket, which includes accessories and repair parts, said Debbie Maranger Menk, project manager for CAR. They work in all 50 states, including nine in Alaska and 145,000 in Michigan, she said.

Each of those supplier jobs has its own substantial trickle-down effect. Another 1.97 million workers produce the steel, rubber and other materials needed to make the parts, or provide engineering, distribution and other support services -- bringing the total to 2.76 million employees with jobs tied to suppliers. The spinoff effect spills into stores and restaurants relying on the income of those workers.

"There are 1.7 million people who owe their jobs to the fact the 2.7 million have jobs," Menk said, equaling 4.4 million just on the supplier side. Factoring in some overlap in the retail spinoff from each supplier and automaker job, she estimates total employment in the auto industry at a minimum of 5 million jobs.

She describes CAR's figures, which are based on a study from earlier this year that used 2006 data, the most recent available, as conservative. They are significantly lower than figures used by East Lansing-based Anderson Economic Group. Senior consultant Ilhan Geckil said Anderson estimated the number of jobs provided by automakers, suppliers, dealers and aftermarket companies, and the resulting spinoff jobs amounted to 8.7 million as of 2006.

Big 3's clout slips

Admittedly, the auto sector has lost some clout. Sales are down 13 percent so far this year, following year-end declines of 3.6 percent in 2006 and 2.9 percent in 2007.

After years of contributing about 5 percent of the country's gross domestic product, or GDP, the figure dropped to 2.9 percent at the end of 2007 and is trending around 2.5 percent now of the $14.5 trillion total, said Dana Johnson, chief economist for Comerica Bank in Dallas. Johnson paints a dramatically different picture of the value of the auto industry nationwide, saying the sector accounts for less than 1 percent of jobs and that the adage of "what's good for GM is good for the country," is no longer the case.

It is good for Michigan and select states, he said, but not the U.S. as a whole.

Autos are a key sector within manufacturing, but Johnson said manufacturing accounts for about 10 percent of U.S. jobs compared with 30 percent decades ago.

"I don't believe the auto sector deserves special consideration," Johnson said. Bailing out financial institutions was necessary to prevent "terrible contagion effects that could collapse the economy," Johnson said. "That should be the standard. To argue national prosperity depends on them (automakers) operating, to me, is much more of a stretch."

'Black eye on the economy'

It's not to those who have seen the Big Three eliminate more than 100,000 jobs in the past three years.

Allowing an automaker to go under would wipe out portions of the supply chain, dragging down healthy foreign automakers, as well, that would have to scramble to find other suppliers to provide their parts. Automakers also buy $15 billion a year in advertising, not counting the huge amount dealers spend.

Automakers spend more on research and development than any other industry except the government, about $18.5 billion a year, McAlinden said, with 85 percent of that done in Michigan.

Both presidential candidates have energy policies and tax incentives for fuel-saving research that cannot be achieved without a healthy and robust auto industry, CSM's Chesbrough said. "The auto sector is key to where the country needs to go in the future to reduce oil dependence," he said.

If GM or Chrysler were to go under, "it would be one more black eye on the economy" for the nation.

Detroit News Staff Writer Robert Snell contributed to this report


http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll...=2008811030343
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old November 4th, 2008, 07:57 AM
InPlay InPlay is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,773
Default

More information

Autos impact on U.S. economy
Job creation

5 Jobs created for each auto job

355,000
Workers employed by automakers in the U.S.

783,000
Workers employed by suppliers

1.972 million
Workers employed by supplier vendors

1.1 million
Workers employed by dealers

Indirect impact

10%
Of all U.S. employment related in some way to vehicular transportation

1.7 million
U.S. jobs that rely on auto production, such as restaurant, retail, etc.
Economic clout

3%
Of GDP produced by auto sector
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old November 4th, 2008, 07:58 AM
InPlay InPlay is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glovesetc View Post
the loans were voted down today so that is good news . Management stinks as well as products . Ford at $2.10 a share is a disgrace .

Loans were not voted down. They are being redone and will be bigger and better then $25 B.

Tuesday, November 4, 2008
Congress weighs more aid for Big 3
David Shepardson / Detroit News Washington Bureau
WASHINGTON -- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi met with key House Democrats on Monday to consider a variety of ways to aid the struggling U.S. auto industry.

The hourlong meeting focused on whether Congress should move to quickly approve up to $25 billion in "bridge financing" to aid automakers through a mounting fiscal crisis. The money would be in addition to the $25 billion auto loan program funded by Congress in September to help retool factories to build more efficient vehicles.

Drew Hammill, a spokesman for Pelosi, said "discussions (are) ongoing," but declined to elaborate on Monday's meeting.

If an agreement is reached to provide more aid, House Democrats will insist that the money come with strings attached, including limits on executive compensation and bonuses, a person briefed on the meeting said.

Congressional aides said they are optimistic that up to $25 billion in immediate government loans can be quickly approved. Several options for administering the money were reviewed at Pelosi's meeting, including giving the Treasury Department explicit authority to distribute the loans.

Another option discussed was to route the money through the Federal Reserve's discount window, which makes low-cost loans, typically to banks, or other Federal Reserve programs.

Congressional leaders did not agree on a specific amount of aid, and planned to gather more information this week.

"The message was they aren't going to let the industry die," a person briefed on the meeting said.

Rep. Dale Kildee, D-Flint, who is chairman of the House Auto Caucus, did not attend Monday's meeting but confirmed that discussions are under way about another $25 billion in loans for automakers.

"The industry is in serious trouble and we need to get them the cash as soon as possible," Kildee said in an interview. Detroit's Big Three have had a strained relationship with House Democrats. The two sides sparred over the 2007 energy bill that called for a 40 percent increase in fuel efficiency requirements by 2020. But times have changed. Pelosi was an early advocate of funding the $25 billion factory retooling program.

The Monday meeting included House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., and many committee chairmen, including Reps. George Miller, D-Calif.; Chris Van Hollen, D-Md.; Barney Frank, D-Mass.; James Clyburn, D-S.C.; Xavier Becerra, D-Calif.; and Sander Levin, D-Royal Oak. Rep. John Dingell, D-Dearborn, took part by phone, as did other members on the campaign trail.

Pelosi also discussed the auto issue separately with Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., aides said.

Over the weekend, Dingell and Sen. Carl Levin, D-Detroit, spoke separately with the CEOs of General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler LLC, as well as United Auto Workers President Ron Gettelfinger.

Alan Reuther, legislative director for the UAW, said the House Democratic leadership "appreciate the severity of the current problem and its situation today ... Because of the financial economic meltdown, auto sales have dropped through the floor, creating enormous liquidity problems."

GM and Ford are expected to report substantial losses on Friday when they release third-quarter financial results. The two automakers lost nearly $24 billion combined in the second quarter and U.S. sales have dropped sharply since then, plunging nearly 32 percent in October.

Chrysler is privately held and does not have to release financial results.

GM and Chrysler majority owner Cerberus Capital Management LP have been in talks about a possible merger since September.

One deal on the table is for GM to sell a majority of its 49 percent interest in GMAC Financial Services in exchange for Chrysler. Cerberus, which owns 51 percent of GMAC, could keep a small stake in a combined GM-Chrysler.

The UAW has retained longtime Wall Street consultant Stephen Girsky to advise the union on merger talks and government assistance. People briefed on the talks said efforts to complete a deal are expected to pick up after today's election.

The push for another $25 billion in loans dovetails with the Big Three's request in August for $50 billion to help modernize factories. In September, they dropped back to $25 billion because of opposition from Congress.

Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama has said he supports the $50 billion in loans and would "immediately" meet with the Big Three and the UAW if elected. Republican opponent Sen. John McCain has endorsed $25 billion in loans without ruling out more funds, and has said he would keep automakers "alive."

The new president's support will be crucial for additional aid to automakers, congressional aides said.

President Bush signed into law the $25 billion low-cost loan program on Sept. 30. It requires the Energy Department to have regulations overseeing the program in place by the end of this month, but loans could still be months away.

Treasury Department officials have been reluctant to green-light additional aid to automakers and have said their preference is for the Energy and Commerce departments to take the lead on assisting automakers. But Treasury has not ruled out buying up the bad assets of auto financing companies through the $700 billion bank rescue plan.

"We believe that the federal government should use all of its tools available to them to support an industry in distress and that is a critical component to the nation's economy," GM spokesman Greg Martin said.

Also Monday, the Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association sent a letter to President Bush calling on him to accelerate the $25 billion retooling loans and establish a loan guarantee program for suppliers.




Find this article at:
http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll...TO01/811040372

Last edited by InPlay; November 4th, 2008 at 08:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old November 4th, 2008, 08:31 AM
InPlay InPlay is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moo321 View Post
It pisses me off because I bought Tata Motors and these dumbass companies are dragging the whole sector down.

Real Danger

Among the damage that has been caused by the export of Chinese products all over the world, even more serious than their effect on Western economies is the damage they have caused to the health of consumers. We can see this by examining the number of deaths due to the use of illegally produced drugs, food and beverages: 38 deaths in Panama and 11 in China due to ingestion of drugs containing diethylene glycol; in China, 13 infants died after having ingested powdered milk which lacked nutritional value; 11 deaths and dozens of individuals stricken with food poisoning caused by a liquor that had been adulterated with formaldehyde; 23 dead in Turkey in 2005 after drinking a "modified" version of raki - a typical Turkish liquor – containing lethal doses of methyl alcohol (the bottles featured the original labels, that had been stolen by the counterfeiters and pasted on the illegal products). If we think for a moment that these are the official data, we can only imagine the true statistics.

http://www.unmadeinchina.org/contStd...g=en&idPag=428
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005-2009 Bayview Strategies LLC