
|

November 20th, 2008, 09:26 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 453
|
|
Don't Think the Founding Fathers Intended?!
For the government to be so big and encompassing? Wasn't the American revolution about taxes and representation?
As the government becomes more of a factor in our lives then politics become more important.
As politics become heated due to their importance in our lives, isn't there the potential for violence?
Did I read somewhere that Obama has mentioned funding abortions? We already know the abortion issue has casused some to resort to extreme violence.
Instead of people and business focusing on their individual issues they are being forced more and more into the political realm because of the effect of government in their lives.
|

November 20th, 2008, 04:11 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 249
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opinion
Did I read somewhere that Obama has mentioned funding abortions? We already know the abortion issue has casused some to resort to extreme violence.
|
McCain and Palin both opposed Roe V Wade and their position could have caused an equal amount of violence, its not a one-way street.
|

November 20th, 2008, 05:56 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,055
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unshake
McCain and Palin both opposed Roe V Wade and their position could have caused an equal amount of violence, its not a one-way street.
|
They would have to cause the deaths of a large percentage of our countrymen, to do the amount of violence abortion has done.
|

November 20th, 2008, 06:54 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 249
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Automatic Monkey
They would have to cause the deaths of a large percentage of our countrymen, to do the amount of violence abortion has done.
|
However, to some, abortion is not violent. In your opinion yes, but more importantly the idea he posed was that people focus economic issues, not individual.
|

November 20th, 2008, 06:56 PM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 747
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opinion
Did I read somewhere that Obama has mentioned funding abortions? We already know the abortion issue has casused some to resort to extreme violence.
.
|
So you're saying we should base legislation on the lunatic fringe who resort to violence if they don't like something?
|

November 20th, 2008, 07:07 PM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 747
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unshake
McCain and Palin both opposed Roe V Wade and their position could have caused an equal amount of violence, its not a one-way street.
|
People who oppose abortion have use threats, vandalism, arson, bombings, kidnapping, stalking, attempted murder and murder (at least seven people assassinated) to advance their extremist agenda. Many, if not most of these people claim to be religious, usually Christian.
Name one documented instance of violent behavior by activists in support of abortion rights.
|

November 20th, 2008, 07:20 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 249
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeorgeD
People who oppose abortion have use threats, vandalism, arson, bombings, kidnapping, stalking, attempted murder and murder (at least seven people assassinated) to advance their extremist agenda. Many, if not most of these people claim to be religious, usually Christian.
|
That was basically my point
|

November 20th, 2008, 07:25 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,055
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unshake
However, to some, abortion is not violent. In your opinion yes, but more importantly the idea he posed was that people focus economic issues, not individual.
|
And to some slavery wasn't cruel. Their side lost the war, fortunately, and it was a very violent war.
|

November 20th, 2008, 08:48 PM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,902
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opinion
For the government to be so big and encompassing?
|
People today often have this image that the Founding Fathers were:
(a) a distinct set of people, who
(b) agreed, on
(c) immutable principles
None of those is the case. The Founding Fathers are a nebulous group of people who vehemently disagreed on nearly every issue, formed factions, snubbed one another, and eventually enough of them settled on enough issues that they could put together a document and tell everyone else to get on the train or get off the tracks (okay, so trains didn't exist then, but if they did, that's what the Founding Fathers would have said).
It's time you got a grip on reality and realized that the Founding Fathers were neither unified in their vision nor in their purpose for creating this country; the entire Constitution, if nothing else, emphasizes compromise of vastly different ideals.
Once you get over the naive assumption that there was ever an idyllic time in our country's history where family values were strong and everything was fine and dandy before the liberals came and screwed it up, then you can start looking at history as it really is: Puritans raped each other; Thomas Jefferson was a racist; abortion is 2,000 years old; child labor was once lauded in this country.
We live in a effed up world, so appealing to a non-existent time when everything was fine and dandy when taxes were low and everyone was happy is futile.
Ever hear of the Whiskey Rebellion? People got so mad about a whiskey tax they took up arms and assaulted federal officers; George Washington raised a militia and kicked their asses. Is that the utopia you're talking about?
|

November 20th, 2008, 10:30 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 8,600
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unshake
However, to some, abortion is not violent. In your opinion yes, but more importantly the idea he posed was that people focus economic issues, not individual.
|
Likewise, to some slavery was not immoral. It ended with the largest loss of American lives in any war ever.
--To Opinion: I have never heard that Obama would favor government funding of abortions. Some citizens might refuse to pay taxes, even as some refused to fight in the Viet Nam war. Moral issues and defiance of government go hand in hand. I doubt he said it, but it would be a way to electrify his following--and split the country right down the middle. I sincerely hope you heard wrong.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:47 PM.
|