Streaks, LOL

[Katweezel]

This is my reply to Sagefrog. Your serious question about whether Parpaluck can bust the Lotto with his systems is ruined by your sarcastic LOL at the end, which shows where you are at. I think you could be one of those Sheeples. You know... can't think for yourself, go along with the multitude, only comfortable with your old, stale, familiar thought patterns; anything outside your little mental box is a threat. Sound familiar?

As for Parpaluck, I have no idea if his Lotto Systems can crack a big one. But I do know he has a loyal band of followers who swear by his various systems. I have a roulette system I got for free from his site, that (gasp) actually works great, when it is worked properly. (It... wins... money!)Anyone can get it, believe it or not, for free. Take a look yourself before you gag on another LOL. But beware; it is not for the lazy, incompetent, sluggish minds. You will need to study it and work at it. Like anything good, it takes work to get the most out of it.

Years ago, he charged $10K for all his systems, but now, some are free and ALL others can be downloaded for the joining members' fee of $15. He has repeatedly said many of his systems have been pirated and illegally reproduced and the small fee is primarily designed to shoot the pirates out of the water.

He is one of the few Blackjack 'experts' that have had the guts to tackle a taboo subject: blackjack streaks. He has what he calls a "Science of Streaks" philosophy, part of which zg posted here. Did you read it? Probably not, too busy LOL at that 'preposterous' idea too, huh? Knowing about streaks and how they apply to BJ can improve your game; great if you still think you don't know it all. But only worth a sneery LOL if you do think you know it all.

I'm glad I made a friend here already...

[cardcounter0]

I have a roulette system I got for free from his site, that (gasp) actually works great, when it is worked properly.

LOL

[sagefr0g]

Originally Posted by Katweezel

This is my reply to Sagefrog. Your serious question about whether Parpaluck can bust the Lotto with his systems is ruined by your sarcastic LOL at the end, which shows where you are at. I think you could be one of those Sheeples. You know... can't think for yourself, go along with the multitude, only comfortable with your old, stale, familiar thought patterns; anything outside your little mental box is a threat. Sound familiar?

lol, i think if you direct that statement to any of the other forum members on this site about the Sheeples part they might tend to disagree. but yes i do have trouble thinking for myself and anything outside my little mental box does tend to set off a red flag.

As for Parpaluck, I have no idea if his Lotto Systems can crack a big one. But I do know he has a loyal band of followers who swear by his various systems. I have a roulette system I got for free from his site, that (gasp) actually works great, when it is worked properly. (It... wins... money!)Anyone can get it, believe it or not, for free. Take a look yourself before you gag on another LOL. But beware; it is not for the lazy, incompetent, sluggish minds. You will need to study it and work at it. Like anything good, it takes work to get the most out of it.

well your right i do find the idea of beating the lottery prepostorous. lol.
far as that roulette system goes i doubt as i'd be interested, sounds like to much study and work for me.

Years ago, he charged $10K for all his systems, but now, some are free and ALL others can be downloaded for the joining members' fee of $15. He has repeatedly said many of his systems have been pirated and illegally reproduced and the small fee is primarily designed to shoot the pirates out of the water.

oh, ok. well if you get a chance let him know i'm enjoying the book by Weaver, Lady Luck The Theory of Probability. it's a pretty good read for first time study of the subject imho.

He is one of the few Blackjack 'experts' that have had the guts to tackle a taboo subject: blackjack streaks. He has what he calls a "Science of Streaks" philosophy, part of which zg posted here. Did you read it? Probably not, too busy LOL at that 'preposterous' idea too, huh? Knowing about streaks and how they apply to BJ can improve your game; great if you still think you don't know it all. But only worth a sneery LOL if you do think you know it all.

i guess your not allowed to provide a direct link for that article since Sonny thinks you are Parapluck. i'll read most anything as long as it holds my interest.

I'm glad I made a friend here already...

same here, sorry if my skeptical nature rubbed you the wrong way.

[blackchipjim]

There are alot of systems out there that when worked properly will beat the odds. Anyone that follows gambling in general has one time or another read or used the system beater system. The Grandmaster system is one that is used and it's offspring is used by rouletters. Skeptics here you bet! where do you think you posted this thread. blackchipjim

[Katweezel]

Originally Posted by cardcounter0

I have a roulette system I got for free from his site, that (gasp) actually works great, when it is worked properly.

LOL

My reply to cardcounter0...I figure the 0 in your handle refers to how many times you won at BJ, while counting...
The point I was trying to make in my post (obviously unsuccessful in your case) is that I put some work in to understand how that roulette system works, and more importantly, how to work it properly. The time I spent studying it was well worth it. I am over two grand ahead with it, (in just 4 months) which is a roulette feat unheard of for me, in 25years of casino experience.

Now, if you are too busy red-LOL with your head up your... well, too bad for you if you don't have the intelligence to at least check out what could be a good, (FREE) idea. K

[Katweezel]

Originally Posted by sagefr0g

lol, i think if you direct that statement to any of the other forum members on this site about the Sheeples part they might tend to disagree. but yes i do have trouble thinking for myself and anything outside my little mental box does tend to set off a red flag.

well your right i do find the idea of beating the lottery prepostorous. lol.
far as that roulette system goes i doubt as i'd be interested, sounds like to much study and work for me.

oh, ok. well if you get a chance let him know i'm enjoying the book by Weaver, Lady Luck The Theory of Probability. it's a pretty good read for first time study of the subject imho.

i guess your not allowed to provide a direct link for that article since Sonny thinks you are Parapluck. i'll read most anything as long as it holds my interest.

same here, sorry if my skeptical nature rubbed you the wrong way.

Mr Frog,
I'm new here as you know, and I know nothing of Sonny. I recall Cher, but that was long ago. As for S thinking I am also Parpaluck; even S, I hope, (if he is a moderator or something official here) would be intelligent enough to realize that Parpaluck and I are based in different countries. A quick check of originating email addresses would confirm that!

Now for one multi-personality to be in two different countries at the same time, each sending emails here, is a feat that even the techno-whiz-geek, Parpaluck would find extremely difficult, if not impossible - even for his legendary skills.

I like your skeptical nature, Frogman, reminds me of mine! I am intrigued by 'posts 3597' under your name. Does this mean you wrote 3597 posts here? If you reply to this, will that be 3598? If that is the case, that is impressive. It surely is an all-time record. Have you put out "Frogman's Greatest Hits yet?" (That was a free, creative idea that occurred to me in the Now. No charge.) Cheers. K

PS Be careful of using too many LOL, or more politely lol (tell cardcounter0.5)
because that habit may give you a new nickname, in red, to add to the Frog.

[Katweezel]

Originally Posted by sagefr0g

lol, i think if you direct that statement to any of the other forum members on this site about the Sheeples part they might tend to disagree. but yes i do have trouble thinking for myself and anything outside my little mental box does tend to set off a red flag.

well your right i do find the idea of beating the lottery prepostorous. lol.
far as that roulette system goes i doubt as i'd be interested, sounds like to much study and work for me.

oh, ok. well if you get a chance let him know i'm enjoying the book by Weaver, Lady Luck The Theory of Probability. it's a pretty good read for first time study of the subject imho.

i guess your not allowed to provide a direct link for that article since Sonny thinks you are Parapluck. i'll read most anything as long as it holds my interest.

same here, sorry if my skeptical nature rubbed you the wrong way.

Mr Fr0g Here is the BJ streaks piece. K
Originally Posted by zengrifter
Voodoo needs more action like his, and to discuss the various fallacious Voodoo systems.
Please let him repost what he previously placed for all to see and discuss.
I'm not trying to discourage discussion, I'm just trying to keep it focused and productive. That won't happen when a troll is involved. Any member who wants to discuss his systems in detail can start a new thread. I have copied the relevant part of his previous post below if anyone is interested.

Quote:
Gambling mathematics can be defined as the science of streaks. A session at the blackjack table can be recorded as a succession of streaks. For example, from the Player's perspective –

Win|Loss|WW|LLL|Push|L|W...etc.

The streaks can be also viewed as skips between hits; e.g. how many hands the Player skipped between two hits (wins). The underpinning of the streaks is undeniably mathematical. If you don't believe me, take Warren Weaver's word on it. The title of the book is: "Lady Luck — The Theory of Probability". The streaks can be calculated precisely and real events concur with the formulae.

I present here only the result of discarding the pushes. The approach considers the blackjack probabilities as follows:

~ Dealer: p = 52% (or 0.52);
~ Player: p = 48% (or 0.48).

Number of hands: 1000 (uninterruptedly; you should always play shorter sessions, under 100 hands).

~ Dealer: 120 single-win streaks and 128 multi-win streaks;
~ Player: 130 single-win streaks and 118 multi-win streaks.

Following is the total number of streaks for the Dealer and the Player in 1000 hands, from single streaks and 2 to 8 multiple like-streaks.

~ Dealer: 120 (single), 62 (double streak), 32, 17, 9, 5, 2, 1: A total of 505 winning hands;
~ Player: 130 (single), 62 (double streak), 30, 14, 7, 3, 2, .8: A total of 475 winning hands.

I wonder why the casinos nowadays scare the players who open a notebook and write down the roulette spins? Moreover, the casinos do not want to turn on the marquees (electronic displays) at quite a few roulette tables. I wonder why the casinos impede me from playing blackjack?

Ion Saliu,
Casinobuster At-Large

[sagefr0g]

Mr Frog,
I'm new here as you know, and I know nothing of Sonny. I recall Cher, but that was long ago. As for S thinking I am also Parpaluck; even S, I hope, (if he is a moderator or something official here) would be intelligent enough to realize that Parpaluck and I are based in different countries. A quick check of originating email addresses would confirm that!

Now for one multi-personality to be in two different countries at the same time, each sending emails here, is a feat that even the techno-whiz-geek, Parpaluck would find extremely difficult, if not impossible - even for his legendary skills.

I like your skeptical nature, Frogman, reminds me of mine! I am intrigued by 'posts 3597' under your name. Does this mean you wrote 3597 posts here? If you reply to this, will that be 3598? If that is the case, that is impressive. It surely is an all-time record. Have you put out "Frogman's Greatest Hits yet?" (That was a free, creative idea that occurred to me in the Now. No charge.) Cheers. K

PS Be careful of using too many LOL, or more politely lol (tell cardcounter0.5)
because that habit may give you a new nickname, in red, to add to the Frog.

no big deal about the number of posts, i can assure you. all it represents is a dogged nature over blackjack, a thing that has potential for profit. i'm like that about things that have potential for profit.

Originally Posted by Katweezel

Mr Fr0g Here is the BJ streaks piece. K
Originally Posted by zengrifter
Voodoo needs more action like his, and to discuss the various fallacious Voodoo systems.
Please let him repost what he previously placed for all to see and discuss.
I'm not trying to discourage discussion, I'm just trying to keep it focused and productive. That won't happen when a troll is involved. Any member who wants to discuss his systems in detail can start a new thread. I have copied the relevant part of his previous post below if anyone is interested.

Quote:
Gambling mathematics can be defined as the science of streaks. A session at the blackjack table can be recorded as a succession of streaks. For example, from the Player's perspective –

Win|Loss|WW|LLL|Push|L|W...etc.

The streaks can be also viewed as skips between hits; e.g. how many hands the Player skipped between two hits (wins). The underpinning of the streaks is undeniably mathematical. If you don't believe me, take Warren Weaver's word on it. The title of the book is: "Lady Luck — The Theory of Probability". The streaks can be calculated precisely and real events concur with the formulae.

I present here only the result of discarding the pushes. The approach considers the blackjack probabilities as follows:

~ Dealer: p = 52% (or 0.52);
~ Player: p = 48% (or 0.48).

Number of hands: 1000 (uninterruptedly; you should always play shorter sessions, under 100 hands).

~ Dealer: 120 single-win streaks and 128 multi-win streaks;
~ Player: 130 single-win streaks and 118 multi-win streaks.

Following is the total number of streaks for the Dealer and the Player in 1000 hands, from single streaks and 2 to 8 multiple like-streaks.

~ Dealer: 120 (single), 62 (double streak), 32, 17, 9, 5, 2, 1: A total of 505 winning hands;
~ Player: 130 (single), 62 (double streak), 30, 14, 7, 3, 2, .8: A total of 475 winning hands.

I wonder why the casinos nowadays scare the players who open a notebook and write down the roulette spins? Moreover, the casinos do not want to turn on the marquees (electronic displays) at quite a few roulette tables. I wonder why the casinos impede me from playing blackjack?

Ion Saliu,
Casinobuster At-Large

well, first off, i don't get the point.
second, i'm reading Weaver's book. and i'm wondering what pages Parpluck is referancing.
third, i've yet to see a casino that doesn't use marquees at the roulette tables.

[newb99]

I'm puzzled. How do you beat roulette, when every spin of the wheel and result is completely independent of the last, the rules and payouts are set and all of the apparatus remains the same for each play?

The only way I can see that you can have a mathematical edge in roulette is:

(a) physically alter the wheel, so perhaps the red slots are wider than the black slots, or get rid of the ZERO altogether.

(b) change the rules, ie different bets ride at diffferent times rather than lose if the number doesn't come up.

(c) change the payouts so that something nearer full odds are paid, ie 9-1 on a four number block rather than 8-1.

Or, of course, a combination of all three . . .

What is the mathematical basis for predicting streaks?

[newb99]

Originally Posted by newb99

What is the mathematical basis for predicting streaks?

Of course, silly me, it's VOODOO ! ! ! ! ! !