
|

January 12th, 2009, 01:34 PM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 918
|
|
Super Fun 21
I'm considering adding this game to my playing options. I'm aware it requires a large spread and was wondering from those who do play it, what the heat is like considering its a carnival game? I assume the casinos now simply look for a big spread even on this game? I've noticed many casinos also switching to double deck from single which probably makes it unplayable.
|

January 20th, 2009, 12:01 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Under the Ace!
Posts: 1,398
|
|
super fun 21
I played it in vegas a few years back for laughs. I agree that a big spread is needed to beat it but I don't have the hard core figuires. It is suppose to be a beatable game even with two decks but don't take my word for it. When I played it I asked the pit boss how it's played and he really touted the game up. I think he got wise to me after a little while when I was making a little too much money to be a dummy. I may have been a dummy for even playing the game! blackchipjim
|

January 20th, 2009, 02:41 PM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,812
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nazgul
|
Awesome link.
|

January 24th, 2009, 12:31 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Moving around
Posts: 42
|
|
superfun 21 Red seven count
http://web.archive.org/web/200502051...SuperFun21.htm Relating to this link could anybody tell me the point of entree using the Red seven count on this game.
Thanks
|

January 24th, 2009, 02:01 PM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,812
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barkingstork
|
It's single deck, so you probably don't have a "point of entree". No mid-deck entry is pretty common.
|

January 24th, 2009, 03:10 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: East Coast, U S A
Posts: 3,749
|
|
Attacking a Single Deck Game with a Level One Count is a mistake to begin with;
but compounding that mistake by using an unbalanced count with very
very few basic strategy departure indices makes matters worse for you.
|

January 24th, 2009, 06:43 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,188
|
|
A 20:1 spread can make up for a lot of technical inelegance.
|

January 28th, 2009, 09:18 PM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,812
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLASH1296
Attacking a Single Deck Game with a Level One Count is a mistake to begin with;
but compounding that mistake by using an unbalanced count with very
very few basic strategy departure indices makes matters worse for you.
|
Blackjacks pay even money, so zen is actually a very good count (-1 for A -2 for Ten).
|

January 28th, 2009, 09:49 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: East Coast, U S A
Posts: 3,749
|
|
Preferred Counts for this game are ...
As Blackjacks have just a 20% bonus in a 6 to 5 game The best counts will
certainly be Level Two counts without Reckoned or Side-Counted Aces.
Hi-Opt II and Advanced Omega II are very clearly the preferred counts to employ.
This is a tough game and using a Level One count is an egregious error that will prove costly.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:28 PM.
|