Mimosine said:
1) No, I pay careful attention to my min bet index, 2u index, 1/2max index, and max index. With unbalanced counts the count jumps drastically from round to round. Basically, for any TC <1 min bet, TC 1+ = 2u, TC 2-3 = 1/2max, TC 4 units = Max, TC 5 try to go to two hands totaling 130% max bet.
when the count is jumping around a lot between 2-3 i try to keep whatever bet i had out there or parlay if warranted. Though often I am off by 2-3 units depending.
2) I play mostly 1 hand, conditions where I am don't often allow two hands to be played. If the count is exceptional I will play two hands - and i think i am going to start back-lining fellow players (if they are good enough).
3) yes
4) this year I will try, maybe vegas....
5) No. I will parlay a little bit, but in some of the games I am playing if the count skyrockets I can't afford to lose 2-3 rounds hoping for a win so that i can parlay. If the count is exceptional enough and I win a double down I will put almost the whole thing out. I will pull back a big bet if I put it out and the count tanks and I push or win. I play a small amount of camo, and try to make my overall betting habits erratic. Though if i get a blackjack and count tanks, I take back a lot, if i get a blackjack and count skyrockets, I'll parlay out almost the whole 3:2 win. I keep sessions short, and try to bet aggressive.
6)i try not to watch tv, though american idol is so inspiring i can't help but watch.
In practice, I used to experiment, with letting all doubled winings ride. It never seemed to pan out for me.
PEvsBCvsSpreadsvsRoRvs#ofhands
Lately, ive been paying more attention to counts, with high PE or high BE.
In general, they either have one or the other. Ive noticed, that "IN general", counts with high PE, are better geared for low spreads. Alot players really dont understand why(including me
) a high BC, is important for MD. The really dont understand that the higher your BC is, the more effective your system is, with larger spreads, verses RoR.
What I see as an ideal day, is Reveres APC(.997) w/ a 1:100 spraed playing 3 hands.
Note on this count it takes, about 1:100 unit spread before it will max out its OSR. Which=the BC of the count. But a count like Zen,(.970) its OSR, is maxed out, on a flat bet! So naturally, Zen would give you a nice tolerable RoR, with fairly low spreads. But it is my belief, that if you start trying to use a 1:100 spread w/Zen, your RoR would be twice as high, as it would, with; let's say, the RAPC, with the same BR. Maybe someone could sim my theory?
Unfortunately BJmath is down, so were no longer to use its effeciency analyzer. I was just getting good at it:cry:
Sorry for getting off-track