Mimosine said:
if you're going to go to an unbalanced level 2 then you should use UBZ as defined by the illustrious members of this board in a sticky above.
simply doubling all the values really doesn't do anything to differentiate the value to the player (and the house) the different cards.
A,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,T
-1,1,2,2,2,2,1,0,0,-2
now you have a count that is almost as effective as Zen & Mentor, not a little more effective than KO Full.
Mimosine,
The books teach us: the power of
unbalanced counts in shoe games is essentially determined by
BC, not so much by PE and IC. So why choose UBZ2 with BC=0.966? Sorry Mimo, of course I know the impressive work of the illustrious members of this board in the sticky UBZ2. I just want to understand the power of BC and the BC of UBZ2 is pretty low.
BC Unbalanced Counts (2-A)
0.995: Uston SS (2,2,2,3,2,1,0,-1,-2,-2)
0.989: Brh-1 (1,2,2,3,2,1,0,0,-2,-2)
0.984: Brh-0 (2,2,2,2,2,1,0,0,-2,-2)
0.984: Red 7 ( all 7’s 0.5) (1,1,1,1,1,0.5,0,0,-1,-1)
0.975: KO (1,1,1,1,1,1,0,0,-1,-1)
0.975: Kiss 3 (all 2’s 0.5) (0.5,1,1,1,1,1,0,0,-1,-1)
0.966: UBZ2 (1,2,2,2,2,1,0,0,-2,-1)
Thanks for any comments
hhrb