
|

March 19th, 2009, 09:19 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 138
|
|
Probablility
If you are playing an 8 deck shoe and you see 23 ten cards in a row off the top, are you any more likely to see a low card as the next card than you would be at a more normal ~-3 tc?
The math says no your not, but it seems to me you still see alot of tens at a t.c. of -3. It also seems like the odds of getting that 24th ten card should be smaller than just 13/49 or ~1/4 (i think thats about the probalility of getting a ten at a tc of -3)
|

March 20th, 2009, 08:57 AM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 965
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stophon
If you are playing an 8 deck shoe and you see 23 ten cards in a row off the top, are you any more likely to see a low card as the next card than you would be at a more normal ~-3 tc?
The math says no your not, but it seems to me you still see alot of tens at a t.c. of -3. It also seems like the odds of getting that 24th ten card should be smaller than just 13/49 or ~1/4 (i think thats about the probalility of getting a ten at a tc of -3)
|
The math doesn't lie. You still have lots of 10's left, even at TC-3. But fewer than TC=0. You have to trust the math. Be careful of imprecise and biased observations or hunches.
|

March 20th, 2009, 09:48 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,750
|
|
a few links on this sort of stuff
__________________
best regards,
mr fr0g  MMOA honorary predator
STRENGTH - HONOR - HEART
that's my take on it your mileage may vary.
for senior citizen fuzzy count click link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrTiP4ZIUfI
|

March 20th, 2009, 10:37 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 138
|
|
Do you mean the excel stuff?
I code VB. Would be fun to learn how to code like he did. Very cool. Thx.
|

March 20th, 2009, 11:20 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: East Coast, U S A
Posts: 1,819
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stophon
If you are playing an 8 deck shoe and you see 23 ten cards in a row off the top, are you any more likely to see a low card as the next card than you would be at a more normal ~-3 tc?
The math says no your not, but it seems to me you still see alot of tens at a t.c. of -3.
It also seems like the odds of getting that 24th ten card should be smaller than just 13/49 or ~1/4
(i think thats about the probalility of getting a ten at a tc of -3)
|
At a T C of 0 probability = 16:36 The % of 10's is 31%. Odds of almost 2 to 1.
At a T C of -3 probability = 13:39 The % of 10's is 25%. Odds of exactly 3 to 1.
__________________
"I have approximate answers and possible beliefs and different degrees of
certainty about different things, but I'm not absolutely sure about anything."
… Richard Feynman, 1965 Nobel Laureate
|

March 20th, 2009, 11:40 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 138
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLASH1296
At a T C of -3 probability = 13:39 The % of 10's is 25%. Odds of exactly 3 to 1.
[/SIZE]
[/COLOR][/SIZE]
|
Wait a second, that doesn't make sense. A TC of -3 is saying that 3 ten cards have been played per deck left. So that would make the odds 13/52 right? 4 to 1?
I don't see where you get the number 39, thats 3/4 of a deck...
|

March 20th, 2009, 11:53 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: East Coast, U S A
Posts: 1,819
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stophon
Wait a second, that doesn't make sense. A TC of -3 is saying that 3 ten cards have been played per deck left. So that would make the odds 13/52 right? 4 to 1?
I don't see where you get the number 39, thats 3/4 of a deck...
|
Odds are actually a ratio such as 2-1, 8-5, 99-1, etc.
If there are 3 face cards removed from the deck then you are left with a deck of 52 cards -- only there are 3 LESS face cards than the normal 16. That leaves 13. That means that you now have 13 face Cards and 39 NON-Face Cards. 13 + 39 =52 So the ODDS are the ratio of 39:13 That reduces to 3 to 1.
__________________
"I have approximate answers and possible beliefs and different degrees of
certainty about different things, but I'm not absolutely sure about anything."
… Richard Feynman, 1965 Nobel Laureate
Last edited by FLASH1296; March 20th, 2009 at 11:55 PM.
|

March 21st, 2009, 12:10 AM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,084
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLASH1296
[B][COLOR="Navy"][SIZE="4"]If there are 3 face cards removed from the deck then you are left with a deck of 52 cards -- only there are 3 LESS face cards than the normal 16. That leaves 13. That means that you now have 13 face Cards and 39 NON-Face Cards
|
Or maybe it might mean, after 3 faces are removed you only have 49 rather than 52 cards left so you have 13 face-cards and 36 non-face cards left.
|

March 21st, 2009, 12:22 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: East Coast, U S A
Posts: 1,819
|
|
You are dealing with a 52 card deck or its equivalent at all times.
The True Count used to be termed, (more correctly). the "Count Per Deck"
When you compute the True Count you are computing the count as it relates to a 52 card deck at all times.
That is what is TRUE about the T. C.
__________________
"I have approximate answers and possible beliefs and different degrees of
certainty about different things, but I'm not absolutely sure about anything."
… Richard Feynman, 1965 Nobel Laureate
|

March 21st, 2009, 12:44 AM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,084
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLASH1296
When you compute the True Count you are computing the count as it relates to a 52 card deck at all times.
|
Thanks for the tip, Sherlock.
Not sure I understand all this but does that mean when 3 faces are dealt off the top of one deck, the TC is now -3.18 if using exact cards?
When you said a TC of -3, were you flooring, rounding or truncating?
Does that still mean with a TC of -3.18, or -4, or -3, the chances of a face are still now 13/36 and not exactly one-third? Or are they still 13/39 because 13+39=52 and that's what all this True Counting is about?
Let me get this straight - if 3 faces come off the top, the chances are 13/39 of another face, so if 10 faces come off the top the chances must be 6/39? Or maybe 6/46 so 6+46=52?
I need another FLASH of inspiration.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:09 PM.
|