Dealer must hit until his total exceeds that of the highest player total. Blackjack is paid first and does not affect play of the dealer's hand.
Is it possible to determine the approximate advantage (for either house or player) in this game?
I would think that because the dealer's hit/stand decisions are affected by the player's hand, the advantage of this game would change drastically depending on the number of players at the table.
For example, at a full table of six or seven people, the majority of the time at least one of the players is dealt a twenty. In that case, unless the dealer has a natural or is able to hit to 21, the entire table wins. It seems that there there would be a significant player advantage in the case of multiple players.
However, in a game with only one player, I am tempted to say that the house advantage would be higher than in normal blackjack, since the advantage of acting last is greatly magnified.
Is it possible to determine the approximate advantage (for either house or player) in this game?
I would think that because the dealer's hit/stand decisions are affected by the player's hand, the advantage of this game would change drastically depending on the number of players at the table.
For example, at a full table of six or seven people, the majority of the time at least one of the players is dealt a twenty. In that case, unless the dealer has a natural or is able to hit to 21, the entire table wins. It seems that there there would be a significant player advantage in the case of multiple players.
However, in a game with only one player, I am tempted to say that the house advantage would be higher than in normal blackjack, since the advantage of acting last is greatly magnified.