
|

April 5th, 2009, 03:35 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1
|
|
Can this be hussled??
i was in a pub the other day and noticed there was an electronic blackjack machine(similiar to a poker machine type setting)...the machine uses 4 decks, it has a minimum bet of $1 and maximum bet of $50. i dont know much past the basics of trying to win at blackjack, but i have a feeling these conditions would be prime for counting and since there would be no interference from dealers/pit managers. how much advantage could one expect to get from these conditions. and how much could be made?
cheers
|

April 5th, 2009, 06:00 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,773
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by julep2597
i was in a pub the other day and noticed there was an electronic blackjack machine(similiar to a poker machine type setting)...the machine uses 4 decks, it has a minimum bet of $1 and maximum bet of $50. i dont know much past the basics of trying to win at blackjack, but i have a feeling these conditions would be prime for counting and since there would be no interference from dealers/pit managers. how much advantage could one expect to get from these conditions. and how much could be made?
cheers
|
Put your money in and see for yourself. It will be a good lesson in life for you. Expereince is the best teacher. With all that said what do you think.
|

April 5th, 2009, 06:08 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,625
|
|
Maybe, if the machine isn't set to reshuffle after every hand. However, to know if the game is beatable we'll need to know the rules and how deep they deal between shuffles. Many combinations of rules will make this game unbeatable. With good rules and perfect play it may be worth a few bucks an hour.
Once we get the rules, maybe you can persuade someone to simulate it.
|

April 5th, 2009, 10:08 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 486
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by InPlay
Put your money in and see for yourself. It will be a good lesson in life for you. Expereince is the best teacher. With all that said what do you think.
|
Experience is not always the best teacher, as that is why (some) ploppies believe in various myths.
Quote:
Originally Posted by julep2597
i was in a pub the other day and noticed there was an electronic blackjack machine(similiar to a poker machine type setting)...the machine uses 4 decks, it has a minimum bet of $1 and maximum bet of $50. i dont know much past the basics of trying to win at blackjack, but i have a feeling these conditions would be prime for counting and since there would be no interference from dealers/pit managers. how much advantage could one expect to get from these conditions. and how much could be made?
cheers
|
Chances are that it isn't beatable. Like Ken said, if you can get more info about the game, and it happens to be beatable, the low limits would yield a small win rate.
__________________
-Sleight-
|

April 7th, 2009, 12:38 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,193
|
|
Perhaps even more importantly, there's a a chance the machine has shorted the payout somehow (like 1:1 on blackjacks) in such a was as to make the advantage much worse than regular BJ.
|

April 7th, 2009, 10:33 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seoul
Posts: 2
|
|
It's my guess that as an electronic game machine each hand is calculated by a random number generator rather than an algorithm based upon 4 decks. Essentially, every hand would be shuffled after each play and completely random. This is just my guess, anyways.
|

April 7th, 2009, 01:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 62
|
|
This entire thread is retarded. You can't beat an electronic game. 95% of them (maybe 100%) pay 1:1 for BJ and 95% of them are algorithim/shuffle every hand. And there is no electronic game anywhere paying 3:2 and dealing multiple rounds from the same deck or shoe. No chance.
|

April 7th, 2009, 01:26 PM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,902
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by julep2597
i have a feeling these conditions would be prime for counting and since there would be no interference from dealers/pit managers
|
Interference from dealers and pit managers is a near-inconsequential problem for people who are betting low stakes, and it is not the primary diagnostic for whether a game is good or not.
Even in the case where there are playable machines, note that the absence of pit managers doesn't necessarily mean there's no scrutiny. As a matter of fact, it is relatively trivial for a computer to remember the last million hands you played, calculate the true count on every hand you've played, and insta-ban you if you're playing with an edge or if you're found to make correct BS deviations. When the pit calls surveillance, all they do is plug your play history into a computer anyway - playing on a computer shortens, not lengthens, that process.
|

April 7th, 2009, 01:34 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sunny Southern California
Posts: 1,187
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie
And there is no electronic game anywhere paying 3:2 and dealing multiple rounds from the same deck or shoe. No chance.
|
Yes, there is. I know the coordinates.
__________________
"I've seen people arrested in the bathroom and that's not the way it's done." -Automatic Monkey
|

April 7th, 2009, 01:38 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,193
|
|
Video poker is the arena where you'd think they'd incorporate a strategy checker into the machine. But strangely, I don't think that's too common.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:30 AM.
|