
|

April 6th, 2009, 01:38 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: So,IL
Posts: 1,764
|
|
Sim Data for Various Zen Betting Strategies
Six Decks,H17,DAS,RSA
75%100Hph,Play-All(2x1-15)
+1<10x10
+2/25x25x25
+3/50x50x50
+4>100x100x100
RoR
10K=33.66%
20K=11.33%
Score=27.46
+1<10x10
+2/25x25x25
+4/50x50x50
+6>100x100x100
RoR
10K=26.14%
20K=6.83%
Score=26.26
+1<10x10
+2/25x25
+3/50x50x50
+4>75x75x75x75
RoR
10K=36.80%
20K=13.54%
Score=20.96
+1<10x10
+2/25x25
+4/50x50x50
+6>75x75x75x75
RoR
10K=24.01%
20K=5.77%
Score=18.76
|

April 6th, 2009, 02:34 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 200
|
|
JJ:
I don't see how these betting schemes fit into real life casinos.
P.D.
__________________
P.D.
A gambler with a private wire......
|

April 6th, 2009, 03:09 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: So,IL
Posts: 1,764
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrinceDragon
JJ:
I don't see how these betting schemes fit into real life casinos.
P.D.
|
You're right, its pretty stupid, now that I think about it. I just looked at a canned sim, using a 1-30 spread on 1 hand olny, and it has a higher win-rate, score and a lower RoR.
Last edited by jack,jackson; April 6th, 2009 at 04:25 AM.
|

April 6th, 2009, 04:24 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: So,IL
Posts: 1,764
|
|

+1<10x10
+2/25x25
+3/50x50
+4/100x100
+5/150x150
RoR
10K=32.55%
20K=10.59%
Score=33.45
I guess what I was trying to say was; how you bet your money is more important than what system you use.
|

April 6th, 2009, 05:09 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 200
|
|
Quote:
|
i guess what i was trying to say was; how you bet your money is more important than what system you use
|
k.i.s.s.
p.d.
__________________
P.D.
A gambler with a private wire......
|

April 8th, 2009, 09:17 AM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: the right side of the bell curve
Posts: 782
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jack,jackson

+1<10x10
+2/25x25
+3/50x50
+4/100x100
+5/150x150
RoR
10K=32.55%
20K=10.59%
Score=33.45
I guess what I was trying to say was; how you bet your money is more important than what system you use.
|
cut out that second $10 bet!! lets get a 1-30 spread
|

April 8th, 2009, 10:04 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 189
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rukus
cut out that second $10 bet!! lets get a 1-30 spread 
|
Would that not lead to much unwanted attention, over even a back-off?
|

April 8th, 2009, 10:21 AM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 965
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UncrownedKing
Would that not lead to much unwanted attention, over even a back-off?
|
It's a little risky, but you can get away with a 1-30 spread (inc 2 hands) with a good act in a big place. I did that all day my last session. (I still lost though.  )
|

April 8th, 2009, 10:26 AM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: the right side of the bell curve
Posts: 782
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UncrownedKing
Would that not lead to much unwanted attention, over even a back-off?
|
its very doable depending on your demeanor and act. also, some like to come off the top with a multi-unit bet and cut back if count goes south, you lose the hand, or the count stays neutral. could reduce what your effective spread looks like to the pit.
|

April 8th, 2009, 10:29 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: So,IL
Posts: 1,764
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rukus
cut out that second $10 bet!! lets get a 1-30 spread 
|
Interestingly thats not the case. No, it doesnt make much sense, but you can see for yourself, regarding this anamoly. Its Correct! Just define the recomended betting strategy>Set rules>attach complete Zen.
Heres 1 unit@+1 and lower(1-30)
+1<10
+2/20x20
+3/50x50
+4/100x100
+5/150x150
RoR
10K=30.57
20K=9.34
Heres the standard 1-15 spread right
RoR
10K=21.38
20K=4.57
Notice the difference in RoR between 2handsx1-15spread and 1-15 spread
10K=32.55%
20K=10.59%
Even though your win-rate, slightly more than doubles, your RoR does not.
Another, advantage is having the ability to control 2 hands at all times, plus this is also assuming a nickel table where double table min is enforced. And most importantly this is a play-all scenario.
Last edited by jack,jackson; April 8th, 2009 at 10:32 AM.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:31 PM.
|