
|

April 14th, 2009, 06:01 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 138
|
|
Another reason why pen matters
It's more than just seeing more extreme counts i think. Using the effect of card removal numbers given on Wizard of Odd's sight, I computed the follow changes in player advantage for each card played:
Low card: 0.54%
Mid card: 0.027%
High Card: -0.51%
So lets say at first your playing a break even 1 deck game. Half way into the game you've seen the exact number of cards your supposed to have seen, being 10 high cards, 10 low cards, and 6 mid cards. If you compute the numbers, your now playing a game with +0.50% adv.
I have no idea why this phenomena occurs. I just know the numbers back it. Perhaps because the dealer cannot as easily draw those 5 card 21's in a single deck game?
Note: I didn't round anything off of WOZ site, just plugged into excel and went. The only error I can think of is if drawing that second 5 has a different EOR than the first one.
|

April 14th, 2009, 06:12 PM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,246
|
|
The pen is mightier than the sword!
__________________
Only those who will risk going too far can possibly find out just how far one can go.
We cannot direct the wind, we can only adjust our sails.
|

April 14th, 2009, 06:22 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,054
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stophon
It's more than just seeing more extreme counts i think. Using the effect of card removal numbers given on Wizard of Odd's sight, I computed the follow changes in player advantage for each card played:
Low card: 0.54%
Mid card: 0.027%
High Card: -0.51%
So lets say at first your playing a break even 1 deck game. Half way into the game you've seen the exact number of cards your supposed to have seen, being 10 high cards, 10 low cards, and 6 mid cards. If you compute the numbers, your now playing a game with +0.50% adv.
I have no idea why this phenomena occurs. I just know the numbers back it. Perhaps because the dealer cannot as easily draw those 5 card 21's in a single deck game?
Note: I didn't round anything off of WOZ site, just plugged into excel and went. The only error I can think of is if drawing that second 5 has a different EOR than the first one.
|
What you are describing is the Floating Advantage. We see the same thing in deeply-dealt shoe games, and when you take a shoe game with decent rules down to the last deck there is also a slight player advantage in a neutral count.
|

April 14th, 2009, 06:39 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 138
|
|
o_0
I read that article too...
I should have recognized that.
|

April 14th, 2009, 06:44 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 138
|
|
Why does the HE edge increase when more decks are put into play?
|

April 14th, 2009, 06:56 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 281
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stophon
Why does the HE edge increase when more decks are put into play?
|
becose basik strategy not working 
|

April 14th, 2009, 07:02 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 138
|
|
shouldn't that just mean higher risk? the overall chance of drawing the same cards is the same there's just a higher chance of the deck getting more out of proportion right
|

April 14th, 2009, 07:09 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,054
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stophon
Why does the HE edge increase when more decks are put into play?
|
Because of the lower probability of getting an ace when you have a 10 and a 10 when you have an ace.
Single deck: first card is an ten, you have a 4/51 (0.07843) chance of the second one being an ace.
Eight deck: first card is a ten, you have a 32/415 (0.07711) chance of the second one being an ace.
It doesn't look like much but it's significant. There are a few other effects mixed in, and even one where fewer decks takes away from the player a little bit (fewer splits) but the Floating Advantage is real.
|

April 14th, 2009, 07:46 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,304
|
|
This is a prime
example as to why we need a pay or "GC" section on this board.
This entire thread makes me cringe.
And you guys wonder why your games get worse, more decks, etc..etc..etc.
I can just see a casino troll printing this off and running to the gaming Manager. 
This entire thread needs to be busted.
And just look at the title of the thread
CP
__________________
"Midwest Masters Of Advantage", "Strength and Honor."
|

April 14th, 2009, 09:09 PM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: the right side of the bell curve
Posts: 781
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by creeping panther
example as to why we need a pay or "GC" section on this board.
This entire thread makes me cringe.
And you guys wonder why your games get worse, more decks, etc..etc..etc.
I can just see a casino troll printing this off and running to the gaming Manager. 
This entire thread needs to be busted.
And just look at the title of the thread
CP
|
this was published years ago in BJA by don s.... we have also published with equally brazen thread titles (many times) why increased pen is infinitely better for a casino >> less time spent shuffling = more time for ploppies (>99% of playing world) to regurgitate money into casino coffers.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:23 PM.
|