41 U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Veterans Challenge the Official 9/11 Story

[zengrifter]

41 U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency
Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11

by Alan Miller

Following in the footsteps of well over 1,000 scientists and other professional groups who have already gone on record questioning the official theory, more than 40 U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency veterans have come forward to challenge the Government’s rendition of the September 11, 2001 attacks. Their behind-the-scenes knowledge and experience of sensitive and classified issues places them in a uniquely authoritative position. In this sense, their critical stance is all the more damning for the government. Conspicuously absent from the landscape are the mainstream media professionals, as they continue to provide cover for the government’s totally bankrupt theory and fail to report on landmark developments such as this.



19 May 2009


The Pentagon after the collapse of the impacted wall.

Official Account of 9/11:“Terribly Flawed,” “Laced with Contradictions,” “a Joke,” “a Cover-up”

More than 40 U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency veterans have severely criticized the official account of 9/11 and most have called for a new investigation. It is outrageous that most Americans are entirely unaware of their publicly stated concerns — a direct result of the refusal of national print and broadcast news organizations to cover this extremely important issue. There is no denying the credibility of these individuals or their loyalty to their country as demonstrated by their years of service collecting and analyzing information and planning and carrying out operations critical to the national security of the United States.

These 41 individuals formerly served in the U.S. State Department, the National Security Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the branches of the U.S. Military. They are listed below by their branch of service. [To read their individual statements and full complementary information, see attached document "Counterterrorism Veterans"].

U.S. State Department

Terrell E. Arnold, MA - Former Deputy Director of Counter- Terrorism and Emergency Planning, U.S. State Department. Mr. Arnold is a leading expert on terrorism and counter-terrorism and the author of several books on the subjects.

Angelo Codevilla, PhD - Former U.S. State Department Foreign Service officer specializing in U.S. intelligence operations in Western Europe. Member of President-elect Ronald Reagan’s State Department transition team and principal author of the team’s report on intelligence. Former Staff Member, U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee dealing with oversight of the intelligence services 1977 - 1985. Former U.S. Navy officer. Currently Vice Chairman of the U.S. Army War College Board of Visitors.

Edward Peck – Former Deputy Coordinator, Covert Intelligence Programs, U.S. State Department. He later served as Deputy Director of the White House Task Force on Terrorism under President Ronald Reagan. Mr. Peck, a 32-year veteran of the U.S. Foreign Service, also served as U.S. Ambassador and Chief of Mission in Iraq 1977 - 1980.

National Security Agency

Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski - A Pentagon eye-witness and a former member of the staff of the Director of the National Security Agency, Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret).

Maj. John M. Newman, PhD - U.S. Army (ret). Former Executive Assistant to the Director of the National Security Agency.

Central Intelligence Agency

Raymond McGovern - A 27-year veteran of the CIA, who chaired National Intelligence Estimates during the 1970’s

William Christison - A 29-year CIA veteran, former National Intelligence Officer (NIO) and former Director of the CIA’s Office of Regional and Political Analysis.

Melvin Goodman, PhD - Former senior CIA official who served as Division Chief of the CIA’s Office of Soviet Affairs and Senior Analyst from 1966 - 1990. He also served as Professor of International Security at the National War College 1986 - 2004.

MORE- http://www.voltairenet.org/article160100.html

[aslan]

Then why doesn't Obama, who seems open to such theories of right wing conspiracies, step forward and reveal the truth. Oh, I know. Reverend Wright said it. He is under the control of his Jewish handlers. Gimme a break! That's why he's snubbing Netanyahu, too, I suppose??? His Jewish controllers are pro-Arab, and his Arab friends are pro-Israel. It's all becoming clear.

[zengrifter]

Originally Posted by aslan

Then why doesn't Obama, who seems open to such theories of right wing conspiracies, step forward and reveal the truth. Oh, I know. Reverend Wright said it. He is under the control of his Jewish handlers. Gimme a break! That's why he's snubbing Netanyahu, too, I suppose??? His Jewish controllers are pro-Arab, and his Arab friends are pro-Israel. It's all becoming clear.

'Jewish' as Wright uses the term is not synonimous with Israeli nor Zionist.
Let us call Obama's bosses Illuminati. zg

[zengrifter]

These are brave patriots. zg

[aslan]

Originally Posted by zengrifter

'Jewish' as Wright uses the term is not synonimous with Israeli nor Zionist.
Let us call Obama's bosses Illuminati. zg

Naw, naw, naw. Wright later corrected his speech saying that he meant Zionists. az

[zengrifter]

Regardless, this is an impressive lineup of 9/11 Truthsters. zg

Ps - Notice the Pentagon wall still standing, it didn't collapse untill several minutes after the "crash"

[aslan]

Originally Posted by zengrifter

Regardless, this is an impressive lineup of 9/11 Truthsters. zg

Ps - Notice the Pentagon wall still standing, it didn't collapse untill several minutes after the "crash"

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaghhhhhhhhhhhhh! If I hear one more 911 conspiracy theory I swear my head will explode in a thousand tiny pieces!!!!!!!!!

[Thunder]

I don't think there is a single conspiracy theory ZG doesn't believe in :-P

[zengrifter]

LOOK at the image. Wake up!

Are you two suggesting that the 41 ex Intel Officers are jerks? zg





SIMPLE GEOMETRY TELLS THE TRUTH!

Look to the evidence provided by elementary geometry. From the bottom of the 757 engines to the mid-line of the wing spar is right at ten feet. Add eight feet for the fence / cable-spool height & you have a wing impact at 18 feet - absolute MINIMUM! That assumes a one-inch clearance of the fence and/or cable spools. Any such impact would be on the second floor - IF there had been a 757!

Whether thinking in terms of a high-wing or low-wing aircraft, the lack of forward-moving impact damage and basic geometry tells the same truth - no possible airplane!

[zengrifter]

THE EVIDENCE:
One hole, 2 ½ yards in diameter
Whatever hit the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 made a hole several meters wide in the front wall between the first and second floors. It emerged three blocks later, leaving behind a perfectly round hole of about 2 ½ yards in diameter.