Refering to the Benefit from Resort World Sentosa sister company Star Cruises as posted above it would appear that RWS is infringing on the Singapore Law. This is the actual wording of the Law.
Prohibited transactions in relation to entry levy
6. Without prejudice to the generality of section 116(3) of the Act,
an indirect refund, remission or reimbursement of entry levy by a casino
operator to a resident shall include —
(a) the giving of any right, privilege, discount or benefit to the
resident (in addition to entry to the casino premises) by the
casino operator or by any other person under an arrangement
with the casino operator, in exchange for payment of the entry
The wording is so broad that it would cover such prohibited benefit. Or do you see a loophole here in the Law.