iCountNTrack said:
I am stuck at the airport in Paris
, but if i am not mistaken only Playing efficiency is only defined/meaningful for balanced, i think betting correlation works for both.
I think that's right, in terms of what information is intrinsically available from the count. But there is a distinction to be drawn between 'an unbalanced counting system' and 'a betting strategy that only uses the running count'.
I'm a bit unclear as to whether Betting Correlation is a measure of how accurately the magnitude of any advantage is determined, or a measure of what proportion of the time a player advantage (of whatever size) is correctly identified. I'd have thought it must be the former, but the wording of some descriptions I've seen is a bit ambiguous.
Only using the running count, you accurately detect when the advantage first swings to the player (if the pivot is at a suitable point), but you need to do a true-count conversion to get the same accuracy at other running counts.
P.S. Hope you escape the airport without too much delay. (Or failing that, have a great time stuck in Paris!
)