
|

August 25th, 2011, 05:33 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 188
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by leopard
The Swedish rules at the proper state casino (NOT bars and clubs, where the rules are a rip-off as described above):
6 decks, shuffle machine
Dealer stands on 17, including soft 17. Ties are treated as normal standoffs, dealer does NOT win.
Double down permitted on 9, 10, 11
Double down NOT allowed on soft hands
Double down permitted after split
Split Aces, one card only, 21 pays even money. Re-split of Aces allowed.
Insurance offered. Also I think an even money payout is offered if player has BJ v dealer A (or 10, not sure).
7-7-7 pays immediate even money bonus, hand itself played out as normal.
Anyone know what the house edge is if playing basic strategy?
|
Do you mean Blackjack pays even money? Forget this game- The house edge will be astronomical.
Pretty sick rules. Casino`s like these should be outlawed in my opinion. Greedy bastards.
|

August 25th, 2011, 06:06 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 4
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tezzadiver
Do you mean Blackjack pays even money? Forget this game- The house edge will be astronomical.
Pretty sick rules. Casino`s like these should be outlawed in my opinion. Greedy bastards.

|
Thanks for the fast response, tezzadiver.
No, blackjack still pays 3-2.
However: when splitting aces, there is no BJ, 21 pays even money. And even money is offered (but doesn't have to be taken, and shouldn't, of course), if you have BJ to dealer's A.
|

August 25th, 2011, 06:55 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 188
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by leopard
Thanks for the fast response, tezzadiver.
No, blackjack still pays 3-2.
However: when splitting aces, there is no BJ, 21 pays even money. And even money is offered (but doesn't have to be taken, and shouldn't, of course), if you have BJ to dealer's A.
|
I get 0.51% HE
I assume no hole card dealt? European style?
Well its not the best of games and of course you can`t count with it as they use CSM`s (continuous shuffler machines) ?
If this was a shoe dealt game- I would still take even money on a dealer ace, If I was showing a BJ at a true count of plus 3.
|

August 25th, 2011, 07:04 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 188
|
|
Apologies- Make that 0.57%
Pretty worthless game IMHO. Maybe ok for practicing basic strategy.
Last edited by tezzadiver; August 25th, 2011 at 07:09 AM.
Reason: calculation error
|

August 25th, 2011, 07:23 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 4
|
|
Yes, European style, no hole card dealt.
Thanks very much for the swift response - much appreciated.
|

August 27th, 2011, 08:06 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: East Coast, U S A
Posts: 3,749
|
|
Being unable to double your soft hands is quite costly; requiring DEEP
penetration and/or a wide bet ramp to make the game exploitable.
|

September 1st, 2011, 01:35 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 40
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLASH1296
Being unable to double your soft hands is quite costly; requiring DEEP
penetration and/or a wide bet ramp to make the game exploitable.
|
No it isn't. It costs about .1 to the basic strategy edge, and isn't all that well correlated with the count.
|

September 1st, 2011, 02:35 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: East Coast, U S A
Posts: 3,749
|
|
Game selection is a primary skill.
.1% is significant in BJ.
The BJ games that I play have e.v.'s from .14 to .35
Ergo, adding .10 is HIGHLY significant.
My skills pay my bills; and game selection is a primary skill.
|

September 2nd, 2011, 12:30 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 40
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLASH1296
.1% is significant in BJ.
The BJ games that I play have e.v.'s from .14 to .35
Ergo, adding .10 is HIGHLY significant.
My skills pay my bills; and game selection is a primary skill.
|
Except that you said:
"Being unable to double your soft hands is quite costly; requiring DEEP
penetration and/or a wide bet ramp to make the game exploitable."
Nope, it is NOT "quite costly", and the lack of the rule does NOT necessarily require deep penetration or some massive spread to be overcome.
Its lack is of modest significance, way down on the list compared to slightly better penetration, ls/rsa, heat, spreads, and other issues.
|

September 2nd, 2011, 03:52 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: East Coast, U S A
Posts: 3,749
|
|
Semantic arguments are a waste of time; so removing the verbiage I shall stick to the numbers.
Thus, if you are playing a game with a House Edge of .3% and you add .1% you have inflated your disadvantage by 33%.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:48 PM.
|