Which is better, REKO or Hi-low?

Do you use either of these? Which one do you think is better and what are the pros and cons of each?

thanks for the help!

lol this is the card counting section...is no one familiar enough with these two to help???

hi

check this for a quick comparision http://www.qfit.com/card-counting.htm
Reko in numbers is more powerful than HiLo, but i cant tell, i use a level 2.
u will play a lot or only once in a while?

thinking again , the response to your question is ;depend of the kind of game u will play the exact response is sim both using your game rules condition etc and then see what hapend
i can sim something for u just tell me your kelly spread rules decks etc
Daniel

ya, i just play once in a while...not consistently. I usually play 6 deck games with the best odds i can find like S17 and DAS. I usually only spread about 1-4 units. I have used hi-lo, but saw reko and liked it cuz its easier, but it seems likes it misses some opportunities in the beginning.

using any strategy with a spread of 1-4 is a lost of time at least u need 1-10, and 1-12 for 8 decks. my advise if u already know HiLo keep it , there is no much increase for almost any change in strategy at least u play a lot and with a big big BR
daniel27
PS if u need a bet spread give me your BR rules penetration kelly etc and i can give u the bet pattern , is morre important have the right bet strategy than the strategy for count for itself.

If you're using Hi Lo and have no trouble converting to a TC and already have your indices memorized then you don't really have any reason to switch over. If these things I've mentioned seem tough then REKO is a great place to start as all your indice plays happen at the same count, and there is no converting needing to be done.

ok thanks guys...guess ill try to increase the spread.