KO count is better than HI LO ??

someone tell me KO count become the best counting method

even better than hi lo for all way ( playing effiecncy , return rate, easy to learn)

any one prove its real ? and how this works ?

there are many unbalanced counting system which i know would not be better than Hi Lo s return rate , how KO will get higher profit aparting from easier to count without coverting to TC ?

KO is NOT stronger than HiLo UNLESS its true-counted.
Moderator - move thread to other forum. zg

There are many factors you have to take into account when comparing counting systems. Using Hi-Lo with indices will beat KO every time and gives you more + counts than KO.

Why should a count which doesn't factor in 7's create more +counts?

Because with Hi-Lo, you don't have to wait for it to get to a running count of 24 or whatever the pivot point is for KO. Sometimes with Hi-Lo, you'll be betting more after just one round!

Its all the same! zg

Sorry, I don't agree. Yes Hi-Lo is better earlier in the shoe and yes you must take into account many factors. But, this isn't where we make money. What counts is overall performance. See http://www.qfit.com/book/ModernBlackjackPage188.htm to look at a large number of factors at once.

Yeah I know about what helps make up SCORE and have seen your charts showing the performance of KO vs Hi-Lo but take a look at this older thread.
http://www.blackjackinfo.com/bb/showthread.php?t=3318