Are Betting Spreads Interchangeable For Balanced Count Systems?

Hello,

Does anyone know if I can use the same betting spread for different balanced count systems without compromising the effectiveness of either one? For example, if I use a certain betting spread for HiLo given a specific set of game rules and conditions, would it be appropriate to use that same spread for Zen for that specific set of rules/conditions, or does each balanced system have its own spread?

If each balanced count system has its own unique betting spread, where can I find it? Any suggestions or comments would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks
Nathaniel

Hmmm...I would have to say, for the most part, "yes." A counting system determines when the composition of the shoe favors the player. When it does, the player bets as much as possible. Full stop.

I suspect it is possible to show, through simulation, that the optimal bet spreads are slightly different for counting systems with different playing efficiencies and betting efficiencies, but for practical purposes, I doubt that it matters.

Of course after playing 2 billion hands, you would probably would see a difference from one to another. Come back to this forum after you play your first billion hands, and let us know...:grin:

It`s differentt !!!
You can check this here:
http://www.qfit.com/cvcxonlineviewer.htm
most differences of course are for TC, HiLo is 1TC, Mentor is 2TC , Zen 1/4 or 1TC, etc.

worth the money to get a simulator, imho.

cvcx is the best choice
Daniel

You are commenting about the counts, aren't you?

He was asking about the betting.

Generally each count has a related optimum betting strategy.

the sims of the link are for bet spread, and is different for each strategy of count cards, each strategy have a different granularity (for the TC) different advantage against the casino , and different behavior according differents rules (that is for the tags) sometimes a strategy is better for a game against other and with differents rules is reverse.
Daniel