
|

April 29th, 2006, 10:32 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,348
|
|
Making "Red Flag" Plays
I've noticed throughout many thread/post conversations that many, if not all of you folks (BS or counters) make some plays that, although mathematically correct, would raise eyebrows in the pit. The primary examples off the top of my head are: soft doubles with the lower totals i.e. A2-A5. I know that combined these plays give the player a minute advantage, but are they worth it in the big picture? There are probably more of these very slight edge plays that we should stay away from. Anyone care to elucidate?
__________________
Harolds Club RENO OR BUST
|

April 29th, 2006, 10:44 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,196
|
|
Doubling A2-5 was more of a red-flag in the 70s, when fewer players knew BS - such plays are more common now. Granted, those doubles are worth a negligible amount to a counter. zg
|

April 29th, 2006, 10:55 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,348
|
|
I get your point
Zg, are there any other particular plays that you stay away from when the "heat" is on?
__________________
Harolds Club RENO OR BUST
|

April 30th, 2006, 12:09 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,196
|
|
|

April 30th, 2006, 04:13 PM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 517
|
|
Splitting 10s is probably the biggest one.
|

May 1st, 2006, 10:39 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,967
|
|
Other "red flag" plays can include standing on 16 vs. 10 (at the appropriate time, of course), taking insurance on big bets, and hitting A,7 vs 9,10,A. Those are the plays that most regular players get wrong so the casinos only expect skilled players to get them right.
However, before you start using drastic camouflage plays you need to know how much they will hurt you. Don Schlesinger gives a complete list of the consequences of misplaying any hand in Blackjack Attack. Also, you should check out Ian Anderson’s “Ultimate Gambit” in Burning The Tables…
-Sonny-
|

May 1st, 2006, 10:53 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,196
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by E-town-guy
Splitting 10s is probably the biggest one.
|
I love splitting 10s. Awhile back I had two max bets out, shy-high count, my first hand was A9, dealer shows 5, I double and catch 10, second hand two 10s, I split 3x and catch 10-10-10 - dealer flips a 6 underneath and draws 4 then 10! I almost ALWAYS split 10s when called for! zg
Ps - Sonny, one of our members here is in LV and he says the R20s is gone at you-know-where.
|

May 1st, 2006, 11:08 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,967
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by zengrifter
my first hand was A9, dealer shows 5, I double and catch 10, second hand two 10s, I split 3x and catch 10-10-10 - dealer flips a 6 underneath and draws 4 then 10!
|
WOW! The count must have dropped through the floor after that! At least you got all your money on the table (and back OFF the table!) before the round was over. Well done.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by zengrifter
Ps - Sonny, one of our members here is in LV and he says the R20s is gone at you-know-where.
|
Oh well, it was GREAT while it lasted. At least I’ve got a few stories to tell the grandkids.
-Sonny-
|

May 2nd, 2006, 02:06 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,348
|
|
I wouldn't think
That taking insurance on a big bet would be a red flag. Not so much the size of the bet ,but more as to the hand being insured. I've seen idiots insure huge bets because they are trying to ''protect" a 20(2 face cards..I love it!) I also see them struggling over the l6vX play,since they go a lot by hunches in that situation and we vary according to the count,I consider that good cover. I do agree with the A7 v 9,X,A and also sometimes wonder if they notice me not doubling 10,11 with a real neg. count. What do you think?
__________________
Harolds Club RENO OR BUST
|

May 2nd, 2006, 06:51 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 1,196
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sonny
WOW! The count must have dropped through the floor after that! At least you got all your money on the table (and back OFF the table!) before the round was over. Well done.
Oh well, it was GREAT while it lasted. At least I’ve got a few stories to tell the grandkids.
-Sonny-
|
Nearly all the tables on Fremont now have Royal Match. I've watched people completely blow their bankroll on that one by betting more on it than on the hand. Most of the time they lose it and when they win, it's only for the small payoff. I have not payed a lot of attention to the paytables in different casinos but can if anyone is interested. Haven't seen a big payoff on it yet.
At 4-Queens, the side bet is a "$" bet. If the dealer shows a 2-7 and you have 18 or better you win. Suited Blackjacks pay 30:1 but only if the dealer has a 2-7 up. I think it's 7:1 if it's unsuited, but NONE of the bets pay unless the dealer has a 2-7.
__________________
Mike A
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:35 AM.
|