Blackjack and Card Counting Forums - BlackjackInfo.com

  #1  
Old May 3rd, 2006, 09:00 AM
tedloc tedloc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 225
Default Weigh in on this

If the count gets negative we lower our bet, Right? Do any of you change basic strategy, when it gets negative? Example... I have an 11, against the dealer 10 and the count is -4 in a two deck game. Both players to my right hit and get 10's making it -6. Should we still double or should we use the same philosophy that we use for betting.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old May 3rd, 2006, 09:05 AM
deadlywizard234 deadlywizard234 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 219
Default

just hit, the true count is -6 now so you would just hit and not double, every card you see adds to your count, so knowing what you know now you wouldn't double. I use the chart in the back of Blackwoods book which shows you should only hit with 11 vs 10 with a true count of -5 or lower. In blackjack knowledge is power

Last edited by deadlywizard234; May 3rd, 2006 at 09:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old May 3rd, 2006, 10:33 AM
double4more double4more is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 19
Default

If you are counting cards, you are to deviate when the count calls for it. That means for both positive and negative counts.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old May 3rd, 2006, 06:30 PM
Canceler's Avatar
Canceler Canceler is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,290
Default

I'd love to see some negative indices for 6-deck KO. I know KO doesn't lend itself to that kind of thing, but a guy can dream, can't he?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old May 3rd, 2006, 09:14 PM
ScottH ScottH is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,534
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canceler
I'd love to see some negative indices for 6-deck KO. I know KO doesn't lend itself to that kind of thing, but a guy can dream, can't he?
I would think that for negative indexes you would have to do some sort of true count conversion. Because a running count of say, -10, doesnt really say much if you dont know how many decks have been played.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old May 3rd, 2006, 11:32 PM
E-town-guy E-town-guy is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 517
Default

Since your profit comes from big bets on positive counts varying your Basic Strategy at negative counts, when you should be avoiding play or betting the minimum, wouldn't affect your EV much.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old May 4th, 2006, 11:24 AM
Sonny's Avatar
Sonny Sonny is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,967
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by E-town-guy
...varying your Basic Strategy at negative counts, when you should be avoiding play or betting the minimum, wouldn't affect your EV much.
That's true. Why worry about what you should do at a -10 count if you are going to Wong out long before that?

In general, negative indices do not add much to your EV (with the exception of a few of the Ill-18), but they can reduce your variance quite a bit if used properly. That can mean less variance, a lower ROR, and smaller bankroll requirements. It may even allow you to start using a higher unit size which will increase your EV greatly.

In general, however, there is only one negative index that you need to know: Wong Out!

-Sonny-
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005-2009 Bayview Strategies LLC