Hi,
It's me again. The Spanish 21 offered in my local casino pays insurance 2.5:1, instead of 2:1 as in regular Blackjack.
I checked and the EV is -12.5%, which is worse than regular Blackjack. I'm thinking of using 10-Count (T(JQK)=-2, Ace~9=+1) as mentioned in Stanford Wong's book, Professional Blackjack.
I'm starting count at -64 as 8 decks and all the 10s are removed. If the running count goes above -16, I should have an edge on insurance bet (+6 per deck, +48 for 8 decks. Or start at 0, +48 to have an edge). It would be appreciated if someone could check it and let me know if I do the math correctly, thanks.
Chisanchen
It's me again. The Spanish 21 offered in my local casino pays insurance 2.5:1, instead of 2:1 as in regular Blackjack.
I checked and the EV is -12.5%, which is worse than regular Blackjack. I'm thinking of using 10-Count (T(JQK)=-2, Ace~9=+1) as mentioned in Stanford Wong's book, Professional Blackjack.
I'm starting count at -64 as 8 decks and all the 10s are removed. If the running count goes above -16, I should have an edge on insurance bet (+6 per deck, +48 for 8 decks. Or start at 0, +48 to have an edge). It would be appreciated if someone could check it and let me know if I do the math correctly, thanks.
Chisanchen