Blackjack and Card Counting Forums - BlackjackInfo.com

  #1  
Old May 7th, 2006, 02:11 PM
ScottH ScottH is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,534
Default Splitting Tens.

I noticed there in Knockout Blackjack they never give any index for splitting tens. At what point is it profitable to split tens? Or should I just never split tens to avoid heat?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old May 7th, 2006, 03:02 PM
zengrifter's Avatar
zengrifter zengrifter is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,186
Default KO 'composite' for ScottH

Split 10s included. zg

-------------

KO 1-2D 'composite' for ScottH

Here are my approximated/composite-type 1-2D RC indices for KO:

(feel free to recommend improvements)

INS=+3

12 /2=+4, 3=+4, 4=IRC, 5=IRC, 6=IRC

13 /2=IRC, 3=IRC

15 /9=+9, 10=+4, A=+8

16 /9=+6, 10=KC, A=+7

8 /3=+8, 4=+6, 5=+4, 6=+4

9 /2=+4, 7=+4

10 /10=+4, A=+4

11 /10=IRC, A=KC

A6 /2=KC

A7 /2=KC

A8 /4=+4, 5=KC, 6=KC

A9 /5=+4, 6=+4

XX /5=+4, 6=+4

SUR:

88 /9=+2, 10=+2, A=+2

16 /8=+5, 9=0, 10=IRC, A=IRC

15 /8=+7, 9=+4, 10=0, A=+3

14 /10=+4, A=+5
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old May 8th, 2006, 12:16 PM
ScottH ScottH is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,534
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zengrifter
Split 10s included. zg

-------------

KO 1-2D 'composite' for ScottH

Here are my approximated/composite-type 1-2D RC indices for KO:

(feel free to recommend improvements)

INS=+3

12 /2=+4, 3=+4, 4=IRC, 5=IRC, 6=IRC

13 /2=IRC, 3=IRC

15 /9=+9, 10=+4, A=+8

16 /9=+6, 10=KC, A=+7

8 /3=+8, 4=+6, 5=+4, 6=+4

9 /2=+4, 7=+4

10 /10=+4, A=+4

11 /10=IRC, A=KC

A6 /2=KC

A7 /2=KC

A8 /4=+4, 5=KC, 6=KC

A9 /5=+4, 6=+4

XX /5=+4, 6=+4

SUR:

88 /9=+2, 10=+2, A=+2

16 /8=+5, 9=0, 10=IRC, A=IRC

15 /8=+7, 9=+4, 10=0, A=+3

14 /10=+4, A=+5
Thanks. Do you have anything for multiple decks?

**EDIT: To adjust these numbers for mulitple decks do you just add the difference in the IRC? Also, I noticed in the KO book some of the indexes for 6 and 8 decks it says "omit". Does that mean that they arent of value because the count never gets to that point?

"12 /2=+4, 3=+4, 4=IRC, 5=IRC, 6=IRC"

Ok, I read this as that you stand with 12 vs 2 and 3 at +4. But what does the 4=IRC, 5=IRC, 6=IRC mean?

Last edited by ScottH; May 8th, 2006 at 12:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old May 8th, 2006, 04:55 PM
zengrifter's Avatar
zengrifter zengrifter is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottH
Thanks. Do you have anything for multiple decks?

**EDIT: To adjust these numbers for mulitple decks do you just add the difference in the IRC? Also, I noticed in the KO book some of the indexes for 6 and 8 decks it says "omit". Does that mean that they arent of value because the count never gets to that point?

"12 /2=+4, 3=+4, 4=IRC, 5=IRC, 6=IRC"

Ok, I read this as that you stand with 12 vs 2 and 3 at +4. But what does the 4=IRC, 5=IRC, 6=IRC mean?
I'm not sure how to calc the #s for 6D - I'll look into it. Can anyone else answer that?

Regarding 4=IRC that means your index 12vs4 is equal to your IRC (which is different depending on how may decks you're playing). zg
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old May 8th, 2006, 07:26 PM
Canceler's Avatar
Canceler Canceler is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,289
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zengrifter
I'm not sure how to calc the #s for 6D - I'll look into it. Can anyone else answer that?
I can't answer that, but you know I'm dying to know the answer!

Lists of indices have always been a little cryptic to me. Let me run something up the flagpole, and see if anyone shoots it down, to mix metaphors.

An index indicates a deviation from regular BS. Anyone who has gotten to the point of being interested in indices should not only know BS, but should be able to figure out what the deviation is.

For example: "12 /2=+4, 3=+4, 4=IRC, 5=IRC, 6=IRC" To me, this means at +4 or above we stand with 12 against 2 & 3. For the rest of it, standing is normal against 4,5,6. Doubling would be crazy, and nothing is said about the 12 being two sixes, so splitting is out. Therefore, at the IRC or lower, we hit 12 against 4,5,6.

Am I thinking about this correctly?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old May 8th, 2006, 08:27 PM
Mikeaber's Avatar
Mikeaber Mikeaber is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 1,196
Send a message via Yahoo to Mikeaber
Default

Just a note that might clairify things a bit. With KO, if you are starting with the prescribed IRC, then +3 is always where you take Insurance. +4 is called the Pivot Point or PP. The Key Count or KC varies with the number of decks in play. So any time you see +4 in these tables, think of it as the Pivot.

Now, the way I would interpret these tables for any number of decks is that you would act the same according to the indices if the number is +4 or greater since that is the pivot (everything connected to the number of decks has been accounted for once the KC has been reached.) Of course it varies if the action is tied to the KC since that itself varies.

Obviously, I'm not an expert here....just someone with logic trying to apply it where it possibly shouldn't be applied.
__________________
Mike A
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old May 8th, 2006, 10:09 PM
zengrifter's Avatar
zengrifter zengrifter is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canceler
For example: "12 /2=+4, 3=+4, 4=IRC, 5=IRC, 6=IRC" To me, this means at +4 or above we stand with 12 against 2 & 3. For the rest of it, standing is normal against 4,5,6. Doubling would be crazy, and nothing is said about the 12 being two sixes, so splitting is out. Therefore, at the IRC or lower, we hit 12 against 4,5,6. - Am I thinking about this correctly?
No, double down. zg
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old May 8th, 2006, 10:11 PM
zengrifter's Avatar
zengrifter zengrifter is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeaber
The Key Count or KC varies with the number of decks in play...
As does the IRC. zg
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old May 9th, 2006, 07:18 PM
Canceler's Avatar
Canceler Canceler is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,289
Default Are you serious?

Quote:
Originally Posted by zengrifter
No, double down. zg
Now see, this is the sort of thing that sends people home crying! The joker smilie makes me think you're kidding. If you're just trying to mess with my mind, you've succeeded!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old May 12th, 2006, 02:58 PM
Sonny's Avatar
Sonny Sonny is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,967
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canceler
Now see, this is the sort of thing that sends people home crying! The joker smilie makes me think you're kidding. If you're just trying to mess with my mind, you've succeeded!
Ah, the Grifter's sarcasm turns another AP into a ploppy!

Yes Chanceler, your intuition is correct. When the count is low you will want to hit those twelves because you are more likely to get a small card on top of them instead of busting. You'll have to excuse ZG, he has a diabolical sense of humor...

-Sonny-
__________________
It's not the size of your bankroll, it's how you leverage it!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005-2009 Bayview Strategies LLC