
|

June 3rd, 2006, 03:22 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,200
|
|
Sonny's Shuffle Tracking!
Sonny posted his marvelous "ST for Dummies I-II" and no one even responded! Do NOT be intimidated by the subject - everyone is to review the subject. and respond accordingly! Mach shnell! zg
http://www.blackjackinfo.com/bb/showthread.php?t=1919
|

June 3rd, 2006, 04:33 AM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 517
|
|
I think I'm intimidated by shuffle tracking in general.
|

June 3rd, 2006, 07:25 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 1,196
|
|
Saw it. Read through it. Didn't have time to digest it. But I have saved it and will be giving it attention. I just can't right now....new Grand Baby is shuffling my priorities for the present!
__________________
Mike A
|

June 3rd, 2006, 09:43 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,750
|
|
Sonny's Shuffle Tracking!
these are great articles. i read them a while back. they are what inspired me to think, hey i might actually be able to do this!
i wish Sonny would write another series about the actual observation techniques of how a shuffle tracker gets a handle on a slug as he follows it through the various grabs, riffles, strips and the plugging of the cut off cards into the discards.
i'm just starting out trying to learn ST. i believe it holds a solution to one of my biggest gripes with regards to ap counting of shoes. because of my limited bankroll i've got to wong out a lot and the joints i play are not very good for wonging in. so what i'm faced with is having to enter a lot of tables from the get go never knowing if the shoe is going to afford an advantageous count or is it going to be one that just drains my stake. it's occured to me that one could use ST as a form of wonging in that would not be so obvious as 'traditional' wonging in. one could stand back and count down a shoe determining a good plug and then one could tell if the next shoe was likely to be worth playing or not.
well i've been observing the shuffles that the joints i frequent use. my problem for now is getting a handle on following the slugs through the shuffle and determining where they end up once the shuffling and cutting is over.
best regards,
mr fr0g
|

June 3rd, 2006, 10:49 AM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,251
|
|
I read them,with great interest. But I need to work on my counting and finish polishing my BS before entering the advance phases. My thanks for those threads and all the help I've gotten so far.
|

June 3rd, 2006, 11:02 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,200
|
|
I cant do the fancy stuff, but I have CUT-OFF tracking down. zg
|

June 3rd, 2006, 01:45 PM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,534
|
|
Learning to shuffle track (successfully) is a lot of work...
|

June 3rd, 2006, 02:42 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,200
|
|
Cut-Off Tracking is relatively easy. zg
|

June 3rd, 2006, 03:06 PM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,534
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by zengrifter
Cut-Off Tracking is relatively easy. zg
|
Can you explain what cut-off tracking is/how to do it? I read about it in Blackjack attack but I didn't understand it very well since I had passed over most of the shuffle tracking pages.
|

June 3rd, 2006, 03:34 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,200
|
|
See ZG Interview page 12. You may paste the page-12 CUT-OFF tracking data in this thread for further discussion. zg
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:38 PM.
|