Splitting 6's vs 10 can add EV ?

somtum

Well-Known Member
#1
I was comparing some numbers on CVdata and when I compared splitting 6's vs 10 than not splitting them my EV for 6's vs 10 increased.

Splitting 6's vs 10 only at a true count of -4 and lower showed an even higher increase in EV and even showed an increase in EV vs an Ace. When I tried splitting 6's vs 7, 8 & 9 EV was virtually unchanged.

This was for a DD game. DOA DAS S17 70% pen.

Counting system used. High OptII w/ Ace side count.

Can someone verify this info ? Am I reading this right ?


(Never Mind) I ran the data again and received different results. Regardless, the EV remains very close whether splitting or not splitting 6's vs... 7,8,9,10 or A which is surprising.
 

iCountNTrack

Well-Known Member
#2
somtum said:
I was comparing some numbers on CVdata and when I compared splitting 6's vs 10 than not splitting them my EV for 6's vs 10 increased.

Splitting 6's vs 10 only at a true count of -4 and lower showed an even higher increase in EV and even showed an increase in EV vs an Ace. When I tried splitting 6's vs 7, 8 & 9 EV was virtually unchanged.

This was for a DD game. DOA DAS S17 70% pen.

Counting system used. High OptII w/ Ace side count.

Can someone verify this info ? Am I reading this right ?


(Never Mind) I ran the data again and received different results. Regardless, the EV remains very close whether splitting or not splitting 6's vs... 7,8,9,10 or A which is surprising.
I am afraid that you are not reading this right. Using composition dependent CA for 6,6 vs T at TC=-4

Split ev is ~-60%
Hit ev is ~-34%
 
Top