Blackjack and Card Counting Forums - BlackjackInfo.com

  #1  
Old June 8th, 2006, 03:14 PM
radioguy21 radioguy21 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 20
Default Card Value Question

I was explaining the basics of card-counting to an intelligent (and non-gambling) friend of mine, and he asked a question that I didn't have a good answer for.

He asked, "Wouldn't it be mentally less-taxing to count the small cards (2-7)as -1 and the big cards (10, A) as +1?"

I've been studying and using KO Preferred for about a year now, and I know that Vancura and Fuchs suggest customizing your count to what you're comfortable with, adjusting the IRC and Key Count as necessary. If you mentally adjusted the card values and adjusted your betting (i.e. increased your wager when the deck was 'negative',) would it cause any problems?

Don't know that I want to re-learn anything, just thought I'd get your thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old June 8th, 2006, 03:45 PM
Mikeaber's Avatar
Mikeaber Mikeaber is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 1,196
Send a message via Yahoo to Mikeaber
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by radioguy21
I was explaining the basics of card-counting to an intelligent (and non-gambling) friend of mine, and he asked a question that I didn't have a good answer for.

He asked, "Wouldn't it be mentally less-taxing to count the small cards (2-7)as -1 and the big cards (10, A) as +1?"

I've been studying and using KO Preferred for about a year now, and I know that Vancura and Fuchs suggest customizing your count to what you're comfortable with, adjusting the IRC and Key Count as necessary. If you mentally adjusted the card values and adjusted your betting (i.e. increased your wager when the deck was 'negative',) would it cause any problems?

Don't know that I want to re-learn anything, just thought I'd get your thoughts?
It's relative. Doesn't really matter. Reverse all the "signs" and you would have a fixed count of -3 in KO for your Insurance Bet, you would have a Pivot Point of -4. Your Key count would also just reverse (+4 for 6-deck, -1 for Double deck and -2 for Single deck.)

Personally, I don't see how it would make any difference unless you are just terrible uncomfortable working with negative numbers. They are just like positive numbers except for a different sign. You still increase and decrease the absolute values.
__________________
Mike A
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old June 8th, 2006, 03:53 PM
ScottH ScottH is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,534
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by radioguy21
I was explaining the basics of card-counting to an intelligent (and non-gambling) friend of mine, and he asked a question that I didn't have a good answer for.

He asked, "Wouldn't it be mentally less-taxing to count the small cards (2-7)as -1 and the big cards (10, A) as +1?"

I've been studying and using KO Preferred for about a year now, and I know that Vancura and Fuchs suggest customizing your count to what you're comfortable with, adjusting the IRC and Key Count as necessary. If you mentally adjusted the card values and adjusted your betting (i.e. increased your wager when the deck was 'negative',) would it cause any problems?

Don't know that I want to re-learn anything, just thought I'd get your thoughts?
You could, but the count would make less sense. It makes sense that a negative count is bad, and a positive count is good for the player. But do whatever you feel is easiest.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005-2009 Bayview Strategies LLC