Blue Efficacy said:
Midwest Player, it really doesn't benefit any of us, or you, to out games like this in CBJN for a few bucks. If it wasn't for the out of the way location and low limits you'd have some angry people.
Blue Efficacy said:
Don't waste your money on that garbage. Associates have let me peek at it for free before, and the few places it is accurate on, it is easy enough to get information on anyway.
CBJN useful? If you're going to LV, sure. If you're a Midwest Player, keep your money!
Woefully inaccurate in many instances, both in favor of and in detriment to the player, depending on the entry.
There is always a trade off in something like this. Of course the foks who know about a good game want to keep it that way. Those who don't know about any good games want information. CBJN is one way to get that information.
My thoughts about this is the pros pretty much have their own networks so they already know about such games. Locals to the area probably know about the games also. CBJN probably helps the those folks who are willing to travel a few hundred miles for a good game.
For some reason CBJN reporting has not effected this game at all. Maybe its the low limits and remote location like you say. However, I probably wouldn't have ever went there if somebody didn't mention this game on BJ21 many years ago. My first report on this game was in 2001 and nothing has changed except they got rid of the bonus for the three sevens.
Also the warning in CBJN about this game is not my warning. Someone else provided that. I always disputed that until my last trip. Now I have some serious questions and I'm not sure what to think. I will give them the benefit of the doubt and assume it was a new dealer who didn't know how to shuffle.
I do take issue with CBJN as just being garbage. I will admit alot of casinos in the Midwest have not been reported on for years but CBJN is better than nothing.