
|

May 26th, 2011, 01:21 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 10,532
|
|
TSA threatens to make Texas a no-fly zone
The revolution has begun. Don't tread on me. zg
In ruthless act of economic warfare, TSA threatens to make Texas a no-fly zone
In what can only be called a ruthless threat of total economic warfare, the TSA has threatened to enforce an economic blockade of Texas if the state legislature passes its bill criminalizing the TSA's lewd pat-downs that have agents reaching down the pants of innocent travelers
Last edited by zengrifter; May 26th, 2011 at 01:53 AM.
|

May 26th, 2011, 02:40 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 10,532
|
|
Mike Adams: This threat is an act of economic terrorism against the state of Texas by the TSA which believes there are no limits to its growing power. It is now holding the economy of Texas hostage in order to get what it wants... namely, the power to intimidate innocent air travelers and reach down their pants at whim.
|

May 28th, 2011, 12:04 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Mid-Michigan
Posts: 1,547
|
|
That is insane
|

May 28th, 2011, 01:52 PM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Here n there......midwest
Posts: 985
|
|
Read that article yesterday.....Would love to see a battle between texas and our wimpy federal government.
Machinist
|

May 28th, 2011, 02:51 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Mid-Michigan
Posts: 1,547
|
|
Civil War 2.0, here we come.
|

May 28th, 2011, 04:38 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,267
|
|
A Basic Freedom
Glad someone/entity is standing up for the 4th amendment!
The safety issue and air travel is an easy fix while upholding the 4th amendment!
1. Have the screening we have had in the past
2. If one fails the initial screening
3. Get a warrant from a federal judge and then go through luggage, pat downs etc. With modern technology a warrant can probably be acquired in 15 minutes.
It's not that hard to uphold the 4th amendment.
|

June 2nd, 2011, 03:01 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 242
|
|
Wow
This is pretty shocking. Apperently the sky is the limit in federal power.
|

June 2nd, 2011, 04:05 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 10,532
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Solo player
This is pretty shocking. Apperently the sky is the limit in federal power.
|
Its part of that Obama ''Change We Can Believe In'' Plan. zg
There is also a SECRET Patriot Act See also - Don't Touch My Junk! - -MUSIC VIDEO
Last edited by zengrifter; June 2nd, 2011 at 04:07 PM.
|

June 5th, 2011, 04:49 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,267
|
|
Where Can This Go?
Perhaps a Supreme Court issue? I thought there were already some cases moving in that direction?
|

June 6th, 2011, 01:22 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 10,532
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackjack avenger
Perhaps a Supreme Court issue? I thought there were already some cases moving in that direction?
|
SUPREME COURT?? You mean the current Junta who ruled in majority that major corporations have the same constitutional right as natural human US citizens - to contribute as much f**king money as they want to a political campaign? You mean those f**kers?
Welcome to 21st century corporate fascism. zg
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
See also -
Thus, non-voters, non-citizens and non-human beings in the form of corporations, with foreign money, or mob money, or you
name it, can take to the airwaves and contribute directly to candidates in an unlimited fashion. And, they are only about one vote away,
perhaps two, from making these unlimited contributions SECRET so we the people don't even know WHO is talking at us so long and loud, or
who's funding it...
The five justice majority opinion, written by Kennedy, effectively declares that corporate treasury money has a constitutional right to be used in an unlimited fashion in campaign politics because it is protected by the First Amendment. This reverses approximately a century of congressional and state regulation of campaign finance...
It's all about attempting to entrench corporate rule: But now it's all in the OPEN like never before. This openness is outrageous, but it's also helpful: the Mask of corporate rule is now off...
MORE- http://www.opednews.com/articles/SUP...100121-49.html
Last edited by zengrifter; June 6th, 2011 at 01:30 AM.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:06 PM.
|