Blackjack and Card Counting Forums - BlackjackInfo.com

  #11  
Old July 16th, 2011, 02:51 PM
tallmanvegas's Avatar
tallmanvegas tallmanvegas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kewljason View Post
It seems to me, the advanced mathematics angle has really been pushed on this site lately. Maybe it is my lack of a mathematics degree and/or background that prevents me from not appreciating this angle as much as others.

Someone visiting this site for the first time and reading through some of these threads, will conclude that to succeed in card counting today, you must play an advanced level 2, 3 or higher count, with multiple side counts, and hundreds of strategy change indices for both the primary count and side counts and that is just not so. I actually believe that in today's game the mathematics is less important than it used to be. The math guys want to run sims showing that a multiple level count will improve your results by .xx percent or two side counts will with hundreds of play variations is worth an additional .xx percent. Some of these guys, I think the majority of their blackjack experience takes place on their computer. They think Qfit's products or even their own programs are their blackjack career instead of a tool to aide in their actual play.

I am not disputing that these advanced card counting ideas don't improve performance. I do believe the value of this 'gain' is overstated, the error rate understated and that it just doesn't translate fully in actual play. I am questioning the value for the majority of players in the real world of play. In the real world there is so much education that must take place on the ground, rather than the computer screen that seems to be overlooked. Things that can result in far greater improvement to your results than higher level counts and side counts. Sniffing out and taking advantage of better games and opportunities. Learning what is and isn't tolerated at different places and tayloring your play to these guidelines and levels. Even learning these tolerance levels for different pit personnel and co-ordinating with their schedules. All these advanced math techniques don't mean squat if you aren't able to apply them anywhere but your computer.

So while, you guys can fight over the merits of such gains in threads that run 15+pages, I want to go on record to say to anyone reading these threads for the first time, or the umpteenth time, whatever your level and intent, from recreational player to supplementing your lifestyle/income, to full-time player, “you don't have to be Newton or Einstein to succeed. You can still do just fine learning the basics”.
This is probably one of the best postings ive seen on this site. Nice job

Tallman
  #12  
Old July 16th, 2011, 03:10 PM
kewljason's Avatar
kewljason kewljason is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,564
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 21forme View Post
KJ - I agree with you 100%. In theory, a higher level count is better. Unless someone plans on playing a billion hands, it doesn't matter. I'd much rather be able to backcount 2 tables at the same time while talking to someone, then worry about making a mistake in a multi-level count.
I didn't even get into time management, which can be a huge boost to results, but this is a great example 21. I am always tracking nearby games as well. The small advantage of an advanced count with several side counts, can't compete with the advantage of exiting your game with a nuetral or even mildly positive count to jump into the game at the next table where the true count has gone +7 only 2 decks into a six deck shoe. Who has higher EV for that segment of time?
  #13  
Old July 16th, 2011, 03:11 PM
tthree tthree is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 21gunsalute View Post
Well I for one honestly don't understand what advantage a higher level count has over a lower level count. I keep hearing it gives "additional information," but it seems to me all it gives is a different number to work with. I don't see where that really gives any additional information. I can see where side counts can give some additional information, and I have started to side count aces when playing DD, but I can't really see where you can garner any additional info from a higher level count. PE and BC may be different between different level counts but quite often one may be traded off for the other. When you add in the complexity of learning some of these counts I just don't see where it's worth it, but to each his own I guess.
I will try to explain how a higher level count has more USEFUL information. The removal of different cards has different levels of significance to the player. This difference varies with each hand match up. A level one count makes removing a 3 look like as removing a 5. No matter what stiff the dealer or player has a 5 makes his hand. That is not the case for the 3. Forty percent of stiffs are still stiffs when it draw a 3. This added information that either a five or 2 weaker cards have been removed to move the count as much as a T is valuable information. It better correlates your bet size to your true advantage for playing purposes. Proper bet sizing is not just flagging when a blackjack is most likely but also factoring in the profitability of doubling and splitting opportunities as well as but in a small part your win loss ratio for straight hands. By flagging these extra opportunities to make money on bigger bets, getting bigger bets out there when you will have more and better doubling and splitting opportunities, you increase your profit while decreasing your N0.

Ace neutral counts with an ace side count avoids this trade off issue. When playing a pitch game you would be happy to trade BC for PE. When playing a shoe game you would be happy to trade PE for BC. When playing with an ace neutral count with an ace side count their is no need to trade off. It is strong in both.
  #14  
Old July 16th, 2011, 03:24 PM
tthree tthree is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kewljason View Post
I didn't even get into time management, which can be a huge boost to results, but this is a great example 21. I am always tracking nearby games as well. The small advantage of an advanced count with several side counts, can't compete with the advantage of exiting your game with a nuetral or even mildly positive count to jump into the game at the next table where the true count has gone +7 only 2 decks into a six deck shoe. Who has higher EV for that segment of time?
No one should argue with you on that point. It is not to applicable when the casino area you are forced to play in is crowded though. I don't struggle to keep a level 2 count. The fact that I use an ace neutral count would make the task of doing what you are talking about for shoe games impossible, for me anyway. For pitch games I could jump in without an ace side count and do fine with my level 2 count. I would still easily keep my side count at the table I was playing at while counting the neighboring tables. But the shoe game depends to much on the ace side count for playability for me to think counting other tables would be worth the effort.
  #15  
Old July 16th, 2011, 03:36 PM
Richard Munchkin's Avatar
Richard Munchkin Richard Munchkin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: California
Posts: 145
Default

What's really amazing is that people have been arguing this stuff for 30 years. I would be amazed if you could find one really successful player (7 figure lifetime winnings) that would attribute it to using a higher level count.
  #16  
Old July 16th, 2011, 04:56 PM
KenSmith's Avatar
KenSmith KenSmith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,118
Default

I'm in full agreement with kewljason. I'd even go further and say that learning strategy variations should be considered optional. You make money counting cards at blackjack by putting your money in the circle when you have the best of it. Everything else is just tweaking.

I like the recommendation that this post be stickied. Done.
__________________
BlackjackInfo.com blackjack basic strategy cards. Latest online casino news in the US: Nevada Online Casinos
  #17  
Old July 16th, 2011, 06:06 PM
kewljason's Avatar
kewljason kewljason is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,564
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KenSmith View Post
I'm in full agreement with kewljason. I'd even go further and say that learning strategy variations should be considered optional. You make money counting cards at blackjack by putting your money in the circle when you have the best of it. Everything else is just tweaking.I like the recommendation that this post be stickied. Done.
Excellent! "Everything else is just tweaking" is a great way to phrase it, Ken. It isn't that these concepts aren't mathematically valid. It's just in the grand scheme of things, the value is minimal. I also think Richard Munchkin makes a good point.
  #18  
Old July 16th, 2011, 06:27 PM
QFIT's Avatar
QFIT QFIT is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NO LONGER HERE
Posts: 2,884
Default

Higher level counts are not needed. The math and the discussions thereof are important, but need not be fully understood by all players. But, a basic understanding of the mathematic principles, particularly behind risk, and an understanding of the effect of side bets, promotions, bonuses, exploitable errors, etc., can be of enormous value.
  #19  
Old July 16th, 2011, 07:40 PM
psyduck's Avatar
psyduck psyduck is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 707
Default funny

to have a "mathematics" thread based on personal beliefs and feelings without any data.
  #20  
Old July 16th, 2011, 07:45 PM
paddywhack paddywhack is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: 3rd rock from the sun, Northwestern quadrant
Posts: 802
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by psyduck View Post
to have a "mathematics" thread based on personal beliefs and feelings without any data.
Have I entered the Twilight Zone???
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:14 PM.


Forum Software vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005-2011 Bayview Strategies LLC