
|

July 26th, 2011, 11:32 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 357
|
|
Bust it blackjack
Does this game become profitable at a certain Hi-Lo Index?
Bet pays if dealer busts on 3 cards.
Bust on 6 15:1
Bust on 7 9:1
Bust on 8 7:1
Bust on 9 5:1
Bust on 10 3:1
Suited 888 200:1
Colored 888 50:1
Last edited by deadlywizard234; July 26th, 2011 at 11:42 AM.
|

July 26th, 2011, 12:57 PM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,277
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deadlywizard234
Does this game become profitable at a certain Hi-Lo Index?
Bet pays if dealer busts on 3 cards.
Bust on 6 15:1
Bust on 7 9:1
Bust on 8 7:1
Bust on 9 5:1
Bust on 10 3:1
Suited 888 200:1
Colored 888 50:1
|
This side bet has a very low correlation to HILO. Look at the bust cards:
10: HILO counts them with aces 80% correlation
9: not counted
8: not counted
7: not counted
6: counted but diluted even more the T by aces. 20% correlation
Side counting the block of 6,7,8 and 9 would be very useful information.
|

July 26th, 2011, 03:22 PM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 856
|
|
You can use a simulator (e.g. cvdata) to find the Effect of Removal (EoR) of each card for this side bet. Just turn on the side bet, customize the shoe by removing a few of each card, and get the EV of this sidebet for different shoe states. Probably not worth your time, though, playing it alone.
|

July 26th, 2011, 05:01 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 364
|
|
Obviously the 8 is the most important card, besides the bonuses it both turns hands into stiffs and busts stiffs. Im becoming a bigger and bigger fan of understanding and including more tactics and strategies even if they sometimes won't be as accurate as you like. For this side bet im pretty sure without doing a side count you could profitably this whenever you notice a lot of aces have come out and a lot of eights are still in there. If you wanted to count the tags might look like
6 7 8 9 +1
2 3 4 5 -1
Or
hi opt and side count aces(-1) vs eights(+1)and betting whenever the true counts combined are >3 and both positive.
|

August 16th, 2011, 09:02 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 14
|
|
Side Bets
It's funny I was playing this just today, and wondering the same exact thing. One thing I did notice is that the side bets take up the dealers time. So it gives us rookies longer to count!
Busting with a 6 pays the best, a ten pays 3:1 so a hi count may be good but have no idea if this is true.
Menessis
|

August 17th, 2011, 12:54 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 295
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Menessis
One thing I did notice is that the side bets take up the dealers time. So it gives us rookies longer to count! 
|
While you're still learning, this can be a good thing. Once you can count at normal playing speed, this is decreasing your $$$$/Hr!
|

October 10th, 2011, 12:39 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 14
|
|
Hi Lo
OK I know the 7's, 8's, 9's are not counted and these are cards that that bust the dealer. But on the other hand all we want to do is have an "educated guess" as to when the dealer is likely to bust. So I think that the hi lo count is helpfull. A hi count helps bust the dealer, and with some luck on the third card!  It pays regardless of what card right, as long as it's the third card.
Just my thoughts.
Menessis
|

October 13th, 2011, 11:17 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 165
|
|
The Hi-Lo true count will give you essentially no information about the dealer bust rate before the cards are dealt. Take a look at this chart on the QFIT blog. As you can see the dealer bust rate is within a 1% window for all true counts from -10 to +10.
Last edited by duanedibley; October 13th, 2011 at 09:20 PM.
|

October 13th, 2011, 07:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 14
|
|
Hmmm....
OK, I was under the impression that counting cards works because a hi count works against the dealer. This is what I based my previos post on. Here is a quote from Arnold Snyder's page. http://www.blackjackforumonline.com/...ngNutshell.htm
"Low cards favor the dealer because they help him make winning totals on his hands when he is stiff (has a 12, 13, 14, 15, or 16 total on his first two cards). In casino blackjack, you can stand on your stiffs if you want to, but the dealer cannot. Casino rules require that he hit his stiffs no matter how rich the deck is in high cards that will bust him."
So it seems to me that a hi count helps bust the dealer ???
Menessis
|

October 13th, 2011, 07:44 PM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,277
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Menessis
OK, I was under the impression that counting cards works because a hi count works against the dealer. This is what I based my previos post on. Here is a quote from Arnold Snyder's page. http://www.blackjackforumonline.com/...ngNutshell.htm
"Low cards favor the dealer because they help him make winning totals on his hands when he is stiff (has a 12, 13, 14, 15, or 16 total on his first two cards). In casino blackjack, you can stand on your stiffs if you want to, but the dealer cannot. Casino rules require that he hit his stiffs no matter how rich the deck is in high cards that will bust him."
So it seems to me that a hi count helps bust the dealer ???
Menessis
|
In a high count dealer stiffs go down but the bust rate goes up. These 2 effects come close to offsetting each other. The increase of blackjacks, splits and double opportunities has a lot to do with why high counts favor the player. That more rare dealer stiff now becomes a split or double opportunity much of the time.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:47 AM.
|