Blackjack and Card Counting Forums - BlackjackInfo.com

  #1  
Old July 26th, 2011, 01:14 PM
FrankieT FrankieT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 357
Default Questions about lucky ladies scenario

Can anyone answer these fundamental questions for this basic scenario:

2d
Hi-Lo
0.8 cut off
LL10


What is the EV gained from the side bet if you bet $25x2 at +7 and $50x2 at +8 and higher? Added RoR to a $10k BR?

Is there a simple side count worth adding? How much EV is it worth using the aforementioned betting strategy?


If anybody could answer any one of these questions it'd be swell.

Last edited by FrankieT; July 28th, 2011 at 10:11 AM.
  #2  
Old July 26th, 2011, 03:14 PM
Daggers's Avatar
Daggers Daggers is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: i was there and now im here
Posts: 101
Default

maybe a side count of aces? i know a side count of 7 is pretty useful. im not too sure about my advice so you should ask the others on here but i would say a side count of aces would work well although i don't know the exact EV.
  #3  
Old July 26th, 2011, 04:00 PM
tthree tthree is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,277
Default

Use the Jstat/Fry with a strike point of TC +10. Your EV is about double than using HILO for the side bet.
  #4  
Old July 26th, 2011, 07:08 PM
FrankieT FrankieT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 357
Default

I noticed in QFIT's analysis of LL he said that it requires decent pen.

What kind of pen is required to get a decent return on lucky ladies (a worthwhile return in my book being 6 units an hour or better with a RoR of 2% for $10k).

Last edited by FrankieT; July 26th, 2011 at 07:11 PM.
  #5  
Old July 27th, 2011, 11:43 AM
Automatic Monkey's Avatar
Automatic Monkey Automatic Monkey is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 5,171
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankieT View Post
I noticed in QFIT's analysis of LL he said that it requires decent pen.

What kind of pen is required to get a decent return on lucky ladies (a worthwhile return in my book being 6 units an hour or better with a RoR of 2% for $10k).
The LL sidebet correlates reasonably well to any count you would use for playing and betting. If a DD game is worth playing at all, the LL is free money added on top of whatever your win rate would be. Because LL requires a more extreme count to be profitable than BJ, it will be more dependent on pen.

If the LL max bet is high relative to your BJ max bet, you might be better off using a tens count (JSTAT/Fry, insurance count, Hi-Opt 1 or 2, etc.) depending on what your needs and capabilities are. But if you're the kind of guy who can bet a $500 max on a table with a $25 max LL bet, it's not worth it in any situation to cheat yourself out of BJ EV to squeeze a few extra dollars out of the LL.
  #6  
Old August 3rd, 2011, 07:35 PM
FrankieT FrankieT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 357
Default

I guess the question should be how much do you make by betting $25x2 on +7 and higher counts for a 0.8 pen game. There's no point in asking the amount made by betting higher than that since the limit is generally $25 - so i've learned and seen for myself.

Last edited by FrankieT; August 3rd, 2011 at 08:32 PM.
  #7  
Old August 11th, 2011, 01:59 PM
EmeraldCityBJ EmeraldCityBJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 130
Default

I don't remember the exact numbers off the top of my head, primarily because I decided long ago not to waste my time with Lucky Ladies.

If you're betting $25 at +7, I am pretty sure your hourly win rate from the bet is <$25 per hour. The problem is that you'll probably end up pissing away losing bets for hundreds of hours, and then get paid your EV in one lump sum the day you finally get the Qh pair. The variance is pretty ridiculous, so unless you are able to spend hundreds or thousands of hours on the game, you're just gambling.

For side counts, the only card that provides a significant amount of additional information is the Qh. As they deal deeper into the deck, the TC required to have an edge on the LL bet decreases, as long as both of the queens are still live. Side counting any other card won't give you much information beyond what you'd get from your primary counting system.
  #8  
Old September 3rd, 2011, 05:18 PM
cityman cityman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 10
Default

I dabble in Lucky Ladies sidebets here and there, but unfortunately the TC of +7 just doesn't come around often enough. I generally dare to put out a $1 bet after seeing a whole slew of small cards played. I figure it makes me fit in with the pploppies a little better. Wouldn't you know it, though...I got both Queens of Hearts in a DD game a couple weeks ago with no sidebet option...
  #9  
Old September 4th, 2011, 12:04 PM
Gamblor's Avatar
Gamblor Gamblor is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Casino backroom
Posts: 1,118
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cityman View Post
I dabble in Lucky Ladies sidebets here and there, but unfortunately the TC of +7 just doesn't come around often enough. I generally dare to put out a $1 bet after seeing a whole slew of small cards played. I figure it makes me fit in with the pploppies a little better. Wouldn't you know it, though...I got both Queens of Hearts in a DD game a couple weeks ago with no sidebet option...
I had two QHs in one session. Not betting then either

Even with that pay scale, the +7 comes up not too infrequently with a certain excellent condition.
  #10  
Old September 5th, 2011, 07:28 AM
FrankieT FrankieT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EmeraldCityBJ View Post
I don't remember the exact numbers off the top of my head, primarily because I decided long ago not to waste my time with Lucky Ladies.

If you're betting $25 at +7, I am pretty sure your hourly win rate from the bet is <$25 per hour. The problem is that you'll probably end up pissing away losing bets for hundreds of hours, and then get paid your EV in one lump sum the day you finally get the Qh pair. The variance is pretty ridiculous, so unless you are able to spend hundreds or thousands of hours on the game, you're just gambling.

For side counts, the only card that provides a significant amount of additional information is the Qh. As they deal deeper into the deck, the TC required to have an edge on the LL bet decreases, as long as both of the queens are still live. Side counting any other card won't give you much information beyond what you'd get from your primary counting system.
I don't know about the EV of the bet relying that much on the QHQH.

I was looking on wizardofodds, and half the EV from the bet comes from the 4:1. About 1/4 comes from the 10:1. . 1/5 from the 25:1.

The 200:1 and 1000:1 account for about 1/10 of the EV.

Last edited by FrankieT; September 5th, 2011 at 05:25 PM.
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:26 AM.


Forum Software vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005-2011 Bayview Strategies LLC