
|

June 23rd, 2006, 05:05 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 51
|
|
wong halves
since im a begginer, my friend told me to start with the HiLo then go to the wong halves count, the wong halves is very hard but effective. so my question is would it be easier to start with HiLo then once mastered move on to wong halves or start with KISS count? or KO count.
thanks, bnoc848
|

June 23rd, 2006, 05:08 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,200
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bnoc848
since im a begginer, my friend told me to start with the HiLo then go to the wong halves count, the wong halves is very hard but effective. so my question is would it be easier to start with HiLo then once mastered move on to wong halves or start with KISS count? or KO count.
|
WongHalves level-3 is definately not recommended. Start with HiLo and you may never need move on. zg
|

June 23rd, 2006, 06:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 51
|
|
would it be better to start with HiLo then moving on to Uston APCor uston SS, or starting with KISS III then moving on to a better one. Or should i start with HiLo and stick with it? or KO.
thanks for your response zengrifter.
Last edited by bnoc848; June 23rd, 2006 at 06:18 PM.
|

June 23rd, 2006, 06:14 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 121
|
|
I started with HI-LO then moved after 6 month to KO and I'm excited :D if I can call it that way... and it works fine!!! If you are willing to learn 100 % BS, the KO departures you are good to go!
__________________
cu
Mackhack
|

June 23rd, 2006, 06:14 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,200
|
|
True-count adjustment is the key issue - HiLo requires it, KO and similar UB'd counts do not. zg
|

June 23rd, 2006, 06:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 51
|
|
well is there a very good count that dosent use true count adjusment?
|

June 23rd, 2006, 06:26 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 121
|
|
KO Count as it is postet a 1000 times in here!!! And just one posting above your Zengrifter told you KO and others!!! Reading!!!
__________________
cu
Mackhack
|

June 23rd, 2006, 06:30 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,200
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bnoc848
well is there a very good count that dosent use true count adjusment?
|
The best "unbalanced" (ie, 'non-TC') system is a level-2 called UBZ -Unbalanced ZEN - and it performs on par with WongHalves. zg
|

June 23rd, 2006, 06:36 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 51
|
|
ok sry for that post forget about it , so i should take the zen count and stick with it? would a better balanced count bring me more money?
|

June 23rd, 2006, 06:37 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 121
|
|
How many more times do you wanna hear it? Use KO and 100 % BS!
BTW. Are you familiar that you max. gain about 1.6 to 1.8% over the casino with counting? Mathematically spoken you will win %1.80 per every 100 bucks you wager!
I hope you have a BK which lets you wager high enough so that you will get your big bucks back!
Good luck with your illusions!
__________________
cu
Mackhack
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:00 PM.
|