Beating blackjack

[infiltratioz]

Hi all,

Its so simple to beat blackjack. No need to count and all those bs. In fact, it is so easy you guy would be kicking yourselves over it if you knew. I could only stand in amazement, how such a rumor like counting can be perpetuated into a full blown myth. Counters or not, you guys help maintain the very casinos that I earn from. If anyone wants a whiff of my highly advanced and mind blowing technique, feel free to drop me a PM.

[tthree]

Whatever troll. You can say you have a system that works but when you say counting doesn't work you loss your credibility right on the spot. Not much with math huh. How do you develop a winning system without it?

[infiltratioz]

My system is entirely mathematical. I have theoretical advantage many fold over
your so called normal counting techniques by using my unique strategy. I have simulated counting techniques many times and have come to a conclusion that it is a long drawn negative expectation play. Many might still be experiencing positive variance over the long run because of a innate mechanism within the counting system which delays on the onset of losses. Play long enough, and I mean long enough, and you shall see that your counting techniques are nothing more than a bunch of mislead plays.

[tthree]

Originally Posted by infiltratioz

My system is entirely mathematical. I have theoretical advantage many fold over
your so called normal counting techniques by using my unique strategy. I have simulated counting techniques many times and have come to a conclusion that it is a long drawn negative expectation play. Many might still be experiencing positive variance over the long run because of a innate mechanism within the counting system which delays on the onset of losses. Play long enough, and I mean long enough, and you shall see that your counting techniques are nothing more than a bunch of mislead plays.

We all have simulators and run hundreds of millions of hands. What is wrong with your simulator that it shows different results.

[infiltratioz]

My simulator simulates real life practical conditions, unlike most simulators which only simulate play theoretically, ignoring the fact that worldly conditions are vastly different from mechanical calculations.

[tthree]

No wonder your simulator shows different results. It ignores math and adds in variables impossible to simulate accurately. I'd go with the other simulators if I were you. Who knows if your system really works with that kind of simulator.

[infiltratioz]

Well, just because its popular, doesn't mean its working. My simulator has been given the essential tweaks that cause it to simulate vastly similar conditions in real life. Other simulators are a moot, simulating nothing close to what you have on the tables.

[tthree]

A voodoo simulator? What will they think of next?

[infiltratioz]

Voodoo simulator? Look whos talking.

[AC232323]