
|

October 21st, 2011, 09:51 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Midwest
Posts: 377
|
|
Zen and the Art of Card Counting
Well, I guess this will serve as my Chautauqua!
I am learning the Zen count with full deck resolution. For the moment it is not too little of a challenge! I am using CV Blackjack; the drills. It is tough going! I find the full table drills to be the hardest at the moment! The one to three card flashcard drills are a little easier and I am really trying to build my speed on those drills.
It is difficult to devote the time needed to learn this count at the moment as many are demanding my time. I am however trying to set aside 45 minutes to an hour per day to train.
I am quite humbled at the moment. Hats off to those of you using this count or any level 2 effectively! I can see it is going to take me some time to get there.
Till next time,
Best of flux to you all!
Coyote
|

October 22nd, 2011, 11:04 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 20
|
|
Good luck Coyote, you'll notice a worthwhile boost upgrading your count (I believe in the range of 10-15% depending on game type). Just make sure you get good enough with it so its second nature, and you can expend a lot of focus on heat awareness/management during your play.
|

October 22nd, 2011, 11:28 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 48
|
|
But a worthy sacrifice it is. For what it's worth, the migration between level 1 and level 2 is the only difficult part. Once you get the hang of it, it'll feel no different to what you were used to. These days, I have a harder time counting with Hilo than I do with Zen.
|

October 22nd, 2011, 02:28 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Midwest
Posts: 108
|
|
Level 1 counts are boring.
|

October 22nd, 2011, 05:56 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 330
|
|
Table Action Plus Counting - You're Closer than You Think
The hard part is not the counting, but counting, TC conversion, & index plays while adding up hands and making conversation.
If you have counted before, you already know how to run all these processes at once. Changing the count is a matter of swapping out one of these things for a different set of weights for the card values.
I doubt it will take long. I practiced with Mentor until it was automatic before I ever hit the tables, and I had a rough first few hours, and then a semi-rough next couple dozen hours, and finally a slightly rough few dozen hours after that.
Now it's easy. The hard part was not learning the count.
|

October 22nd, 2011, 08:29 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 10,532
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote
I am learning the Zen count with full deck resolution. For the moment it is not too little of a challenge! I am using CV Blackjack; the drills.
|
I think you mean to say that you are learniong ZEN '83 count-per-deck? Your resolution, though would be a function of deck pene location, yes? I use 1DTC but I resolve as low as 1/2D or even lower depending on where I am at in the pack.
If you are not fully committed to your TC modifier and new indices yet, I strongly recommend that you customize your new ZEN to a 2DTC... or go with Renzey's Mentor. Anternately, if you have any doubt about your TC ability and/or pretty much play the same #decks, I recommend you strongly consider UBZ. zg
|

October 23rd, 2011, 08:14 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Midwest
Posts: 377
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zengrifter
I think you mean to say that you are learniong ZEN '83 count-per-deck? Your resolution, though would be a function of deck pene location, yes? I use 1DTC but I resolve as low as 1/2D or even lower depending on where I am at in the pack.
If you are not fully committed to your TC modifier and new indices yet, I strongly recommend that you customize your new ZEN to a 2DTC... or go with Renzey's Mentor. Anternately, if you have any doubt about your TC ability and/or pretty much play the same #decks, I recommend you strongly consider UBZ. zg
|
Yep ZG you're right. Zen count-per-deck. I am making the time to practice so I do not want to go from on qusi-unbalanced system to another unbalanced system. I want to be able to walk up to any table and use a great method and not have to adjust my runing count and indices.
|

October 23rd, 2011, 08:32 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 10,532
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote
Yep ZG you're right. Zen count-per-deck. I am making the time to practice so I do not want to go from on qusi-unbalanced system to another unbalanced system. I want to be able to walk up to any table and use a great method and not have to adjust my runing count and indices.
|
Renzey's 2DTC (ala Mentor) applied to ZEN is ideal for you.
-- Or Open Source UBZ w/ composite indices, only requires adjustment of IRC and KC (or mentally doubling indices)
|

October 23rd, 2011, 11:22 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Midwest
Posts: 108
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zengrifter
If you are not fully committed to your TC modifier and new indices yet, I strongly recommend that you customize your new ZEN to a 2DTC.
|
zg, is the point of this to help reduce errors when calculating the TC?
|

October 23rd, 2011, 11:28 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 10,532
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NAP
zg, is the point of this to help reduce errors when calculating the TC?
|
No. The error rate would be no different, but the 2DTC is more accurate for betting than the more common 1/2DTC and 1DTC.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:47 AM.
|