
|

November 2nd, 2011, 05:45 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 117
|
|
AP vs Cheat
An extract from Steve Forte's Casino Game Protection reads:
"Often, when you compare the cheater to the legitimate card counter or advantage player, the only distinction you will find is one of legality"
I was quite surprised by this, what does everyone else think?
|

November 2nd, 2011, 05:56 PM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,277
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Percy
An extract from Steve Forte's Casino Game Protection reads:
"Often, when you compare the cheater to the legitimate card counter or advantage player, the only distinction you will find is one of legality"
I was quite surprised by this, what does everyone else think?
|
Look at the source.
|

November 2nd, 2011, 06:03 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,815
|
|
Forte
Forte needs to have a discussion on this matter with an AP who is not a pussy in a very private location.
CP
|

November 2nd, 2011, 06:07 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,267
|
|
the courts have decided
He needs to be sued
|

November 2nd, 2011, 06:19 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,564
|
|
I think you guys are taking things too personal. He didn't say that card counters and AP were cheaters. He specifically said that the law distinguishes that they are not. He was simple stating, that from the casinos point of view, both activities one legal, the other not legal, will have the same outcome, to harm the bottom line and as such both are viewed as unfavorable and undesirable by the casino. Nothing new here. Not sure what you all are getting so worked up about?
|

November 2nd, 2011, 06:26 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: California
Posts: 145
|
|
Sorry, I agree with Steve. Both the cheater, and the advantage player are looking for ways to extract money from a casino.
I played with computers when it was legal. Then they changed the law so I stopped. Someone who plays with a computer now is cheating. Is that person so different than me?
Some players practice thousands of hours trying to control dice. They are trying to control the outcome of the game, and this is not cheating. Someone who slides the dice is cheating. Are those players really so different?
|

November 2nd, 2011, 06:34 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,815
|
|
Richard
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Munchkin
Sorry, I agree with Steve. Both the cheater, and the advantage player are looking for ways to extract money from a casino.
I played with computers when it was legal. Then they changed the law so I stopped. Someone who plays with a computer now is cheating. Is that person so different than me?
Some players practice thousands of hours trying to control dice. They are trying to control the outcome of the game, and this is not cheating. Someone who slides the dice is cheating. Are those players really so different?
|
Geez man,,you just made no sense at all
CP
|

November 2nd, 2011, 06:52 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 28
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Percy
An extract from Steve Forte's Casino Game Protection reads:
"Often, when you compare the cheater to the legitimate card counter or advantage player, the only distinction you will find is one of legality"
|
Steve is simply giving an accurate definition of two professions, with which I completely agree.
I think we sometimes make the mistake of confusing what is legal and what is moral. Hole carding, for example, has been found in the courts to be legal. Even if someone considers the practice immoral, it's inaccurate to call a hole carder a cheater; he simply is an immoral AP in that person's opinion.
Steve's definition wisely avoids the murky area of morality.
|

November 2nd, 2011, 06:59 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,815
|
|
David
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Spence
Steve is simply giving an accurate definition of two professions, with which I completely agree.
I think we sometimes make the mistake of confusing what is legal and what is moral. Hole carding, for example, has been found in the courts to be legal. Even if someone considers the practice immoral, it's inaccurate to call a hole carder a cheater; he simply is an immoral AP in that person's opinion.
Steve's definition wisely avoids the murky area of morality.
|
Murky morality, hmmm,,cute,,,I consider the casino, hands down, as extremely immoral, and any one who can turn the tables on them is "high Five" in my book   Nothing "murky" there David.
Well Dave, while we are at it,,,what side of the fence are you,,,on??
CP
|

November 2nd, 2011, 07:06 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Casino backroom
Posts: 1,118
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Percy
"Often, when you compare the cheater to the legitimate card counter or advantage player, the only distinction you will find is one of legality"
|
"Often, when you compare a rapist to the legitimate man making love with his wife, the only distinction you will find is one of legality"
People say things in certain ways, while being totally and technically accurate, of course can convey different things, in this case, intentionally in all likelihood.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:16 AM.
|