Where is the REAL Saddam? LOOK!

[zengrifter]

Allowing Shaddam to open his mouth at all in court was a serious error of judgement, because like fingerprints used by law enforcement agencies, teeth and dental work are absolutely unique, in this case proving one-hundred-percent that Shaddam never was and never could be President Hussein. If you look closely at the photo-composite at the top of this page, you will see four small inset photographs of President Hussein. In all of them you can clearly see his neat white even teeth, made possible in part by the fact that Iraq has [or had] more dental surgeons per head of population than any country in the world apart from Libya. This expert dental service was free to all Iraqis, and President Hussein's teeth were and are in pristine condition.

Now look again closely, and you will see that President Hussein's upper teeth naturally close in front of his lower teeth, known in professional dental circles as 'overbite'. This condition is normal for nearly all of us, but sadly not for Shaddam, who in at least fifty of Christiane Amanpour's separate video frames proves he suffers from a rare condition known as 'underbite', where a defective or misshapen jaw bone causes the lower teeth to close in front of the upper teeth. This single forensic fact is absolute proof that Shaddam is not President Hussein. The additional fact that Shaddam has ragged uneven teeth when compared to the even teeth of President Hussein is interesting of course, but unnecessary because we already have absolute dental proof that Shaddam is an imposter.

Source: http://www.vialls.com/iraq/vaudeville.html

[Brutus]

what about the DNA evidence?

[zengrifter]

Originally Posted by Brutus

what about the DNA evidence?

Cant be done impartially. zg

[Brutus]

Sending an innocent man to death is nothing new.

I see the differences with the teeth, (and agree) why the heck doesnt the peasant version on trial finally admit that he is an imposter?

We knew going into Iraq that there were many Saddam doubles. Even one of the news anchors looked exactly like him.

Was the govt so desperate for capture, (to bouy support for the supposed war on terror) that they hatched this plan to put one of the doubles on trial?

What about Saddam's daughters? have they been present at the court proceedings? I dont remember seeing them on the news. Wouldnt they at least show up if their father was on trial? Wouldnt they? Maybe they know its not him.

Was the peasant told that there will be no hanging.

or maybe there will be no real hanging.

Either way, that puts Saddam on the loose. (probably with billions) but where, Jordan? Syria? Russia? the orient? Scottsdale? San Clemente? Ha! Thats it. Hes been doing the morning run at San onofre, waiting at the gate, drinking coffee with the regulars.

judas priest.

Or maybe its just another in a long string of red herrings, intended to confuse the real issue. whatever that is.
For alot of Americans, its just too ugly to take a close look at.

[supercoolmancool]

Do you guys honestly believe that is not Saddam?? You are joking right?
Such outrageous claims beg for harder evidence. Otherwise one could make weak arguments for anything and you should believe him with your logic. I think you need to be weary of both professional debunkers and professional sensationalists.

[zengrifter]

Originally Posted by supercoolmancool

Do you guys honestly believe that is not Saddam?? You are joking right?
Such outrageous claims beg for harder evidence. Otherwise one could make weak arguments for anything and you should believe him with your logic. I think you need to be weary of both professional debunkers and professional sensationalists.

The teeth don't lie. AND then there is this -

Saddam's wife could not recognize her husband

PRAVDA | 13.04.2004

Last week, American authorities arranged a meeting of the former Iraqi dictator with his wife.

She was the first of Hussein’s relatives to meet with the ex-leader of Iraq at a new place, at the American military base in Qatar. Accompanied by Sheikh Hamad Al-Tani, Sajida Heiralla Tuffah has arrived from Syria on his private jet in the end of March.

The outcome of their meeting turned out to be quite scandalous. Sajina claims that the person she encountered was not her husband, but his double. If someone were to say for sure that it was not insinuation, it would have been easy to believe the wife with a 25-year experience. It is also possible to assume that Saddam has simply changed since the day of his sons' deaths, June 24 2003. This however is highly unlikely. In case we believe Hussein’s wife, all DNA testing of the ex-Iraqi leader should be considered a mere fake. Overall, today there remain more questions then there are answers.

On the other hand however, those statements of Hussein's wife can in fact be quite understandable. After all, this is the easiest way to demoralize an enemy.

Hussein's younger daughter Hala has also arrived at the base in Qatar along with Saddam Hussein's two grandsons and two sisters, total of eight people. They were all invited by Shekh’s wife Muza to stay in one of the palaces. Eldest daughters Ragad and Rada along with five Hussein’s grandchildren have recently arrived to Doha from Jordan.

“Elaf” newspaper writes that, most likely, the entire Hussein's family will stay in Qatar permanently.

Saddam Hussein was captured by the American forces in December 2003 and held in one of the palaces in Baghdad in a region controlled by the coalition forces. Afterward, due to security reasons, he was transferred to the American military base in Qatar, where he is expected to remain until the trial.

xxx

[zengrifter]

When is Saddam not Saddam?
Jim Fetzer (READER WEEKLY 15 July 2004)
EXCERPT -
Indeed, under pressure from Russia, the US reluctantly allowed Saddam's wife, Sajida Heiralla Tuffah, access to her husband in Qatar. According to Vialls, "Sajida arrived from Syrian with her official escort, Sheikh Hamad Al-Tani, and then entered the prison, emerging only moments later pink with rage and shouting, 'This is not my husband but his double. Where is my husband? Take me to my husband." She was given the unconvincing explanation that he had changed a lot in custody, which she did not accept, insisting she would know her own husband.

Complete PDF - http://www.assassinationscience.com/...not_Saddam.pdf

[Brutus]

Originally Posted by supercoolmancool

Do you guys honestly believe that is not Saddam?? You are joking right?
Such outrageous claims beg for harder evidence. Otherwise one could make weak arguments for anything and you should believe him with your logic. I think you need to be weary of both professional debunkers and professional sensationalists.

Wake up, and smell the chorizo, amigo.
we couldnt even catch Pancho Villa.
(my great grandfather included)

[supercoolmancool]

Originally Posted by Brutus

Wake up, and smell the chorizo, amigo.
we couldnt even catch Pancho Villa.
(my great grandfather included)

Yah I guess I am convinced. It makes sense if the whole world is, as David Icke suggests, a big fantasy movie being carried out and played by actors. I don't necessarly believe that but if one was trying to fit the facts to match a preconcieved theory than yah it would work. Bad science though.

[zengrifter]

Originally Posted by supercoolmancool

Yah I guess I am convinced.

Run a biometric FRS on his images and you'll find that his eyes (distance between pupils) don't match either. zg