Is Bush Next? - The Goose And The Gander

[zengrifter]

Is Bush Next? - The Goose And The Gander
By Paul Craig Roberts

EXCERPT - If Saddam can be sentenced to death for his responsibility in the killing of 148 Shiites, what about Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld/Blair's responsibility for the tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians slaughtered by Bush's invasion of Iraq? This massive carnage is the direct consequence of an illegal invasion--a war crime in itself for which Nazi leaders were sentenced to death--that was based on lies and deception. Bush himself admits that 30,000 Iraqi civilians have been killed. Iraq Body Count puts the civilian deaths at between 45,000 and 50,000. The recent Johns Hopkins University study published in the peer-reviewed British medical journal, The Lancet (11 Oct, 2006), puts the Iraqi civilian deaths caused by Bush's invasion as high as 655,000.

...more - http://www.rense.com/general74/goose.htm

[zengrifter]

Neocons Make Excuses for Mass Murder
Saturday November 04th 2006, 5:25 am

In America, instead of facing justice, criminals from up high usually write memoirs, or become “elder statesmen,” and are interviewed, settling comfortably into the historical record, either oblivious to or proud of the swathe of blood and gore that enshrouds them.

For instance, take the neocons, who should be filling up the docket at the Hague for plotting and executing the invasion and occupation of Iraq—current death total, 650,000, with millions floundering in abject misery—but are instead allowed to walk free and talk freely with David Rose, Vanity Fair contributing editor.

Richard Perle, Michael Ledeen, Frank Gaffney, Kenneth Adelman, David Frum, Michael Rubin, Eliot Cohen—these comprise the very marrow of the neocon criminal camarilla. Rose interviews them as one would interview any petty bureaucrat (Adolf Eichmann comes to mind). Rose’s article, or the short preview here, casts the neocons as pentiti, the Italian word for those who have repented.

...more - http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=639

[mdlbj]

What about the states that sponser the terrorists that kill hundreds of iraq nationals every week?
What about china for killing thousands of prisioners that have committed maybe nothing as a crime.
What about Bill Clinton for bombing Serbia and killing civilians.
What about JFK for starting the Vietnam war.
What about the american soldiers that do anything to stay alive in Afganistan and Iraq, then get blamed for war crimes.
What about the mossad for killing people out of their borders.
What about the police man that shoots someone when they are a threat to society.
What about vetrans that have killed people in war.

" This massive carnage " Massive carnage? This guy should go to Sudan, Somalia North Korea, or even better, go watch a woman get 80 lashes for getting raped in downtown Kiro.

I do like his instinct to want to kill.. Awesome..

Originally Posted by zengrifter

Is Bush Next? - The Goose And The Gander
By Paul Craig Roberts

EXCERPT - If Saddam can be sentenced to death for his responsibility in the killing of 148 Shiites, what about Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld/Blair's responsibility for the tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians slaughtered by Bush's invasion of Iraq? This massive carnage is the direct consequence of an illegal invasion--a war crime in itself for which Nazi leaders were sentenced to death--that was based on lies and deception. Bush himself admits that 30,000 Iraqi civilians have been killed. Iraq Body Count puts the civilian deaths at between 45,000 and 50,000. The recent Johns Hopkins University study published in the peer-reviewed British medical journal, The Lancet (11 Oct, 2006), puts the Iraqi civilian deaths caused by Bush's invasion as high as 655,000.

...more - http://www.rense.com/general74/goose.htm

[Brutus]

Gentlemen,
now that the dems have a little more control, there could be impeachment proceedings. I honestly believe impeachment would be bad for the country,
but then who knows.

anyone catch the prez today?
he seemed a little worried and nervous, but ready to cooperate.
a changed man?

[Automatic Monkey]

Originally Posted by Brutus

Gentlemen,
now that the dems have a little more control, there could be impeachment proceedings. I honestly believe impeachment would be bad for the country,
but then who knows.

anyone catch the prez today?
he seemed a little worried and nervous, but ready to cooperate.
a changed man?

There will be no impeachment unless the Democrats are truly that stupid. Presidents have to be impeached for specific things. Clinton committed perjury which is pretty well defined. The only people who support impeachment of Bush are the Michael Moore and Daily Kos types with their conspiracy theories who help bring in the votes of the lunatic left but embarrass the Democrats in every other sector, so the Democrats will be happy to keep these people and their ideas on fringe websites and off the nightly news.

Right now everything revolves around 2008. The Democrats have one very bad candidate (Hitlery) but the Republicans have no clear frontrunner. That is actually a good thing, because you don't end up with a weak candidate like Bob Dole in there just because it was his turn to run.

What we (speaking as a Republican) have to do now is make Democrats pass the legislation we want and allow them to take credit for it. We can also attach unpopular things to their bills and make them take the blame for it. This was very effective during the Clinton years in that we could get Clinton to sign nearly anything as long as he gets to look like the hero. Now they have to actually address issues like illegal aliens. Anything bad they try to pass, Republicans will just nod their heads and let Bush veto it.

[zengrifter]

Originally Posted by Automatic Monkey

The only people who support impeachment of Bush are the Michael Moore and Daily Kos types with their conspiracy theories who help bring in the votes of the lunatic left...

Just Say NOW!

Marcus K. Dalton | Tribune Media Group | June 24, 2005

For the impeachment of President Bush and Vice President Cheney, that is.

Under Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution, impeachment of the co-conspirators in the White House should be part of mainstream political discourse.

...more - http://www.lasvegastribune.com/20050...itorials3.html

[zengrifter]

Originally Posted by Brutus

...anyone catch the prez today?
he seemed a little worried and nervous, but ready to cooperate.

Sounds like Saddam (his double anywy) when he was captured he said "I'm willing to negotiate." zg

[mdlbj]

Bush is only worried about where his library is gonna be. Im sure its gonna be somewhere down yonder.