Lieberman's 'Victory'

[zengrifter]

Lieberman's 'Victory'

From Christopher Bollyn
11-11-6

Now with the Senate nearly split 50-50, Lieberman is in the position to be the kingmaker. He is like the small religious parties in Israeli coalitions who can demand all kinds of things because their votes are needed to provide the majority.

The entire state of Connecticut uses Diebold AccuVote Optical Scan voting equipment. Diebold voting systems (like ES&S, Sequoia, and others) are notorious for being easily hacked. These machines are primarily used to steal elections.

See: http://www.verifiedvoting.org/verifier/map.php?&topic
_string=5std&year=2006&state=Connecticut

The Diebold page on the OS equipment: http://www.diebold.com/dieboldes/sol...agement_os.asp

This means that nobody in Connecticut is counting any votes and that the results can be easily manipulated. While I am not in the position to prove that the results were manipulated it is also true that no one can prove that the results are correct.

With electronic voting machines we are engaged in faith based voting. We put our faith in a system where we, the citizens, have absolutely NO oversight of the vote count. There is nothing democratic, open, or transparent about the elections in Connecticut (or any other state).

Given the importance (for the Zionists) of Lieberman staying in power, and his refusal to accept defeat in the primary, suggest to me that there is a much bigger thing at stake than his pride or paycheck. I certainly suspect that the results were manipulated to guarantee his victory.

--Christopher Bollyn

[Automatic Monkey]

Originally Posted by zengrifter

Lieberman's 'Victory'

From Christopher Bollyn
11-11-6

Now with the Senate nearly split 50-50, Lieberman is in the position to be the kingmaker. He is like the small religious parties in Israeli coalitions who can demand all kinds of things because their votes are needed to provide the majority.

The entire state of Connecticut uses Diebold AccuVote Optical Scan voting equipment. Diebold voting systems (like ES&S, Sequoia, and others) are notorious for being easily hacked. These machines are primarily used to steal elections.

See: http://www.verifiedvoting.org/verifier/map.php?&topic
_string=5std&year=2006&state=Connecticut

The Diebold page on the OS equipment: http://www.diebold.com/dieboldes/sol...agement_os.asp

This means that nobody in Connecticut is counting any votes and that the results can be easily manipulated. While I am not in the position to prove that the results were manipulated it is also true that no one can prove that the results are correct.

With electronic voting machines we are engaged in faith based voting. We put our faith in a system where we, the citizens, have absolutely NO oversight of the vote count. There is nothing democratic, open, or transparent about the elections in Connecticut (or any other state).

Given the importance (for the Zionists) of Lieberman staying in power, and his refusal to accept defeat in the primary, suggest to me that there is a much bigger thing at stake than his pride or paycheck. I certainly suspect that the results were manipulated to guarantee his victory.

--Christopher Bollyn

It's a God-damned lie! I live in Connecticut, vote in Connecticut and I have never voted on anything other than an old-fashioned mechanical voting machine.

These filthy, dirty anti-Semite bastards who make this stuff up can suck my kosher salami.

[zengrifter]

Originally Posted by Automatic Monkey

It's a God-damned lie! I live in Connecticut, vote in Connecticut and I have never voted on anything other than an old-fashioned mechanical voting machine.

These filthy, dirty anti-Semite bastards who make this stuff up can suck my kosher salami.

But seriously, without sugar-coating, how do you real feel about liberals? zg

Connecticut Update (8/30/06)
Much has happened since the TrueVoteCT web site was last updated, both in Connecticut and nationally. Here's a brief guide to where we are now with respect to new voting equipment and to issues currently facing the state. Connecticut has chosen to buy Diebold AccuVote-OS optical scanners to replace its lever machines and to buy the IVS telephone voting system to meet HAVA's accessibility requirements.
...More - http://www.truevotect.org/

Connecticut Diebold Voting Machines - 1 in 3 Are Rigged
Touch Screen Models Turn Out To Be Pre-set For, You Guessed It, Republicans
West Filabucket, CT /DenounceNewswire/ -- 18 February 2004 -- K.R., an eighteen-year-old programmer from West Filabucket, Connecticut today revealed on his web log that he had discovered that one in three Diebold AccuVote-TS electronic touch-screen voting machines, which are being widely used this year in elections across the country, do not actually accept the voter's vote, but rather, are pre-rigged to cast a ballot full of Republican candidates.
...more - http://www.denounce.com/archives/000052.html

Susan Bysiewicz demonstrates new Connecticut Voting Machines
"There is nothing secure, and nothing less hackable about this [Diebold] sytem. It is a compuerized reader operating a computer program. There is no reasonable way to determine if the program does what the registrar or mechanic thinks it will do, nor is there a way to prevent the program from overwriting itself after it has tabulated and reported a vote."
...more - http://ctbob.blogspot.com/2006/09/su...rates-new.html