
|

November 13th, 2006, 08:40 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 138
|
|
Counting technique
What technique do you guys use when counting the first 2 cards dealt to the players and the dealers upcard? As of now I count each hand separately, not trying to cancel adjacent hands. I am running into some trouble using this method especially against a fast dealer when the count is into multi-syllable numbers. I find im not able to say so many multi-syllable numbers in my head quick enough. For example, say the counts at 23. Player 1 shows K,Q Player 2 shows 3,5 Player 3 shows 9,3 Player 4 shows 8,10 and the Dealer shows 6. I would count the round like this....23,21,23,24,23,24. Would you guys recommend me to practice more and keep up what im doing, try and cancel adjacent hands, or any other methods that might be helpful?
Last edited by Jeff25; November 13th, 2006 at 10:16 PM.
|

November 13th, 2006, 09:35 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 412
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff25
What technique do you guys use when counting the first 2 cards dealt to the players and the dealers upcard? As of now I count each had separately, not trying to cancel adjacent hands. I am running into some trouble using this method especially against a fast dealer when the counts in multi-syllable numbers. I find im saying to many large numbers in my head. For example, say the counts at 23. Player 1 shows K,Q Player 2 shows 3,5 Player 3 shows 9,3 Player 4 shows 8,10 and the Dealer shows 6. I would count the round like this....23,21,23,24,23,24. Would you guys recommend me to practice more and keep up what im doing, try and cancel adjacent hands, or any other methods that might be helpful?
|
I count each card as it comes out. I have no problem keeping up with the fastest of dealers. However, i would not recommend this technique. It can be cumbersome in pitch games.
|

November 13th, 2006, 10:14 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,193
|
|
I'm not a very fast counter (and I only use KO!), what's slow for me is the actual incrementing or decrementing of the count. Therefore, I find counting each card to be prohibitively slow. I'll count each hand and take advantage of canceling. Actually, once I get you to it I start canceling all kinds of stuff. Adjacent hands, 3 hands at the dealer's hands, hands out of order, throw in a couple of drawn cards, etc.
It generally speed things up, until I get too crazy, then I run a risk of losing the count.
|

November 13th, 2006, 10:43 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 295
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff25
I am running into some trouble using this method especially against a fast dealer when the count is into multi-syllable numbers. I find im not able to say so many multi-syllable numbers in my head quick enough.
|
It's best to be able to "see" the count in your mind instead of "saying" it to yourself. When I practice counting, using real cards or CVBJ, I like to sing aloud at the same time. That forces you to envision the count. It's tricky at first but it just takes some practice.
|

November 13th, 2006, 11:30 PM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,534
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cass
I count each card as it comes out. I have no problem keeping up with the fastest of dealers. However, i would not recommend this technique. It can be cumbersome in pitch games.
|
It's time to break the habit man. It is so much easier and more natural to count them in pairs!
|

November 14th, 2006, 05:42 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 412
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottH
It's time to break the habit man. It is so much easier and more natural to count them in pairs!
|
I know! As long as things are dealt face up it is great, but im thinking of making a trip to laughlin, and possibly tunica. I'm assuming most those games are going to be dealt face down. Ive just been too lazy to relearn.
|

November 14th, 2006, 06:18 PM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,246
|
|
I practice half face up,half face down.This way I don't get too used to any one method.
|

November 14th, 2006, 06:24 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,193
|
|
Incidentally, one thing I've found slightly useful when just practicing with a deck of cards is to count down the deck one card at a time, then two cards at a time, then three cards at a time, just to mix it up.
Dealing out random numbers of cards would also work, but by then my manual dexterity slows everything down too much.
|

November 14th, 2006, 08:06 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,289
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cass
Ive just been too lazy to relearn.
|
I recently changed the order in which I count the cards. If I can do it, you can do it!
|

November 14th, 2006, 08:17 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,055
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EasyRhino
Incidentally, one thing I've found slightly useful when just practicing with a deck of cards is to count down the deck one card at a time, then two cards at a time, then three cards at a time, just to mix it up.
Dealing out random numbers of cards would also work, but by then my manual dexterity slows everything down too much.
|
Recently I've started counting down decks (just because everybody else does it, I didn't start by practicing that way) and my method is to grab approximately a quarter of a deck, spread it out, count, pick it up and put down the next quarter deck. This simulates the number of cards that get dealt out to a full table in a shoe game, and also dilutes the effect of poor dexterity because you aren't handling the cards as much.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:43 AM.
|