
|

November 21st, 2006, 04:03 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 56
|
|
Richard Canfield counting method
Anybody use this system? What is the purpose of not counting the 8's and 2's?
|

November 21st, 2006, 05:12 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,196
|
|
Most of the advice is antiquated. As for your question, counting 3-7 vs. 10-A is more or less equal to HiLo. zg
Balanced Level-1 Counts (2-A)
HiLo: 11111 000 -1-1
ITA: 11111 10-1-1-1
UPM: 01111 100 -1-1
|

November 21st, 2006, 06:50 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 56
|
|
Thanks, but what is the purpose of not counting the 2 and 8's? What does it do? I see why they don't count the Ace. Because they want to keep a side count of it. But the 2 and 8's?
|

November 22nd, 2006, 08:24 AM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,967
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by newbie
Thanks, but what is the purpose of not counting the 2 and 8's? What does it do?
|
The eights are pretty much useless from an EOR perspective so it doesn't make sense to count them. I don't know of any card couting system that includes the eights. He probably ignores the twos in order to keep the count balanced. Not counting the twos does make it less accurate though. Also, counting the nines hurts it a bit as well.
-Sonny-
__________________
It's not the size of your bankroll, it's how you leverage it!
|

November 22nd, 2006, 09:25 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,055
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonny
The eights are pretty much useless from an EOR perspective so it doesn't make sense to count them. I don't know of any card couting system that includes the eights. He probably ignores the twos in order to keep the count balanced. Not counting the twos does make it less accurate though. Also, counting the nines hurts it a bit as well.
-Sonny-
|
Uston APC counts the 8's, I think. It does increase the insurance correlation but I don't think that count makes any sense overall.
|

November 22nd, 2006, 02:34 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 56
|
|
But the dealer and ourselves can get a alot of hands with 8's left in the deck. For instance, if the dealer has a 10 showing, then a 3 underneath. And he pulls that 8, then he wins. I would think the 8 can be counted as either a high card or a low card. If there alot of 8's left in the deck, then that can go against us. Unless we keep a running count of the 8's. But that's a little too much for a newbie.
Not sure if I should continue to learn this Canfield system or go for the unbalanced knockout. I think all the systems keep the same count at the end, it just depends on what is more easier for the person to understand. Right? I mean they all end at a zero count at the end if they are balanced.
Not that it matters much with playing against 6 decks. I heard some casino's use 60 decks. :-( What ones use 60 decks? Does anybody know?
|

November 22nd, 2006, 02:51 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,967
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by newbie
I think all the systems keep the same count at the end, it just depends on what is more easier for the person to understand. Right?
|
That's pretty much true, but a more accurate system will identify more positive situations and it will more accurately express how big they are. In the end you are usually raising your bets at the same time but the more accurate player will raise his bets slightly more frequently and by a more appropriate amount. As you said, the best system is the one that you can use the easiest and fastest.
-Sonny-
__________________
It's not the size of your bankroll, it's how you leverage it!
|

November 22nd, 2006, 03:14 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,196
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by newbie
I would think the 8 can be counted as either a high card or a low card. If there alot of 8's left in the deck, then that can go against us. Unless we keep a running count of the 8's. But that's a little too much for a newbie.
|
7s are even more ambigous than 8s (ie, 'bi-valuate') and there are "multi-parameter" systems that adjust for relative densities of these cards... BUT you need not worry about them. zg
|

November 25th, 2006, 04:14 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 56
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zengrifter
7s are even more ambigous than 8s (ie, 'bi-valuate') and there are "multi-parameter" systems that adjust for relative densities of these cards... BUT you need not worry about them. zg
|
Why don't I have to worry about them? If they are in the deck, then I have to worry about them. What systems adjust for these ambigous cards such as 7 and 8's like you said?
|

November 26th, 2006, 12:51 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,967
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by newbie
Why don't I have to worry about them? If they are in the deck, then I have to worry about them.
|
You don't really have to worry about the eights because they do not change the house edge. If you remove an eight from the deck it will not increase or decrease your advantage. That is why systems like HiLo, which don't count the 7-9, are still very powerful. Card counting is all about estimating the player's advantage at any point inthe deck/shoe. Cards that don't affect the player's advantage much can often be ignored without losing much accuracy.
Counting the 7-9 may help increase the accuracy of your playing, but that is not as important as the accuracy of your betting.
-Sonny-
__________________
It's not the size of your bankroll, it's how you leverage it!
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:07 AM.
|