Blackjack and Card Counting Forums - BlackjackInfo.com

  #1  
Old January 1st, 2007, 12:44 PM
jmp jmp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 30
Default A few questions from a novice

Hello, i actually visited this website almost half a year ago for the first time, and bought 2 books to get starting, i learned basic strategy and KO-Rookie, and actually learned it pretty well, but i had to quit due to school, i just didnt have the time to learn counting propperly, and not at all enough time to go to casinos to play.

Well, im back, no school, now im just working, so i have started all over, and im almost as far as i was when i stopped back then. Anyways,

i like to read these forums, i have learned ALOT from just reading threads, but there are alot of abbreviations, and i hope that some of you can tell me what they mean:

Wong/wonging
ROR
EV
AP

Thanks, Jmp.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old January 1st, 2007, 01:05 PM
Monkey!Boy Monkey!Boy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 19
Default Definitions for You

Welcome, and best of luck with counting!

Wonging: Entering or leaving a table based on the count. Named after BJ legend Stanford Wong. Wonging lets the player minimize (or completely eliminate) the amount of play in negative shoes, but can be bad for cover and difficult in crowded conditions.

ROR: Risk of ruin-- the likelyhood of losing all of your money. This can be fairly big, even if you are playing a good game.

EV: Expected value-- the amount of money you'll win, on average. Another important concept is standard deviation (SD), which indicates how far away from the EV you're likely to be. SD is much bigger than EV in blackjack, and is used to calculate your ROR.

AP: Advantage player. That's us. We play casino games at an advantage. The opposite of AP is ploppy. They're the ones who plop their money into the circle and then blame because they doubled down on seven and lost. They pay our bills.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old January 1st, 2007, 01:56 PM
jmp jmp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 30
Default

Thanks!

Jmp.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old January 3rd, 2007, 01:08 PM
jmp jmp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 30
Default

Hello again

I dont feel the need to spam the forums by making one more thread, so heres a question more, yet another rookie one hehe.

I have gotten down the basic strategy, and im only making mistakes very very rarely, and i have learned the K-O rookie strategy, and implemented the insurance play for when the RC = and > +3. Im playing about 500 hands per day(i know this is absolutely nothing compared to you guys who play it for a living), but its a nice 1½-2 hours of play for me, per day, which i think is a fair amount, anyways, blabla, enough about my newbie ablilities!

My question:

I have moved onto the K-O preferred strategy, and i find it fairly easy to use, exept i dont quite understand 1 part. In basic strategy, you are supposed to hit a hard 12v2 and hard 12v3. I guess this is because 12 is a fairly low hand, and you have a great chance of getting a high hand with just 1 more card, and the dealer has a great chance of busting, because he will need 2 more cards no matter what, you get the point, if the point is right ofc.

But, in the preferred strategy, you are supposed to stand if the RC is lower than +4, otherwise hit. So this means that you have to stand if the RC is for example 0, or -3 or +2, but not +5, then your supposed to hit. But my experience(yes i know), tells me that i get more hands that are below +4, overall(which would make sense, since you start your count at the IRC(-4) and work your way to the final count(+4), so you would experience more hands below the final count), than hands that are over, so knowing about the preferred strategy now, i dont understand why the basic strategy was build like this, when it, if you understand me, would have been more profitable to just stand on them both, untill you hit a RC of +4. I know this might sound really really confusing, im not sure if i understand it myself if i read it, but i hope you do. Please tell me if i misunderstood something!

Jmp.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old January 3rd, 2007, 01:19 PM
RJT RJT is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 849
Default

JMP,
You've made a small but understandable mistake. You stand if the RC is greater than or equal to +4. If you think it through, when the count is +4 or above, then there are more high cards in the deck. This means that if you hit your 12, you are more likely to draw a 10 and bust your hand.
So you should hit 12 if the count is less than +4 and stand 12 vs 2 or 3 when the count is greater than +4.

RJT.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old January 3rd, 2007, 01:22 PM
Sonny's Avatar
Sonny Sonny is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,967
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmp View Post
Hello again
Howdy! :D

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmp View Post
In basic strategy, you are supposed to hit a hard 12v2 and hard 12v3...But, in the preferred strategy, you are supposed to stand if the RC is lower than +4, otherwise hit.
I think you have that backwards. You should hit when the RC is low because you are more likely to get a small card. When the RC is high (+4 or above in this case) you should stand because you are more likely to bust with a ten if you hit.

-Sonny-
__________________
It's not the size of your bankroll, it's how you leverage it!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old January 3rd, 2007, 02:23 PM
jmp jmp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 30
Default

You guys are absolutely right, i had it turned around in my head!

It makes alot more sense now that you have explained it to me! Thanks, i wont ever fail on these hands anymore, i promise!

Jmp.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old January 4th, 2007, 03:59 AM
dacium dacium is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 378
Default

Sounds like you are head of most of the people here already.

I doupt there is anyone here that actually card counts full time or even everyday for 2 hours.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old January 5th, 2007, 02:19 PM
jmp jmp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 30
Default

Here we go again:

I have moved on and read a bit about the modified proportional betting, which seems fairly simple, exept if you play a 6 deck game, or even 8 deck game, but it doesnt seem that complicated. I also read about the RoR, and i have a question about it. How risky do you guys play? Using a 200 units bankroll gives a 75% chance of doubling your bankroll, 500 units equals 95% and 1000 units equals 99,5%. I know the amount of time it takes, rises dramaticly, as you increase the amount of units, so, how risky are you guys, what do you suggest? I guess 200 units is faaaar too risky, but what do you guys use?

I know the numbers i presented varies. Those numbers were under the following circumstances: 2 decks, 1-5 spread, using K-O preferred.

Jmp.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old January 5th, 2007, 02:42 PM
Sonny's Avatar
Sonny Sonny is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,967
Default

I generally keep a ROR of 2-5%. That means about a 600-800 unit bankroll for me. It all depends on what your EV and SD are.

-Sonny-
__________________
It's not the size of your bankroll, it's how you leverage it!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005-2009 Bayview Strategies LLC